Investigating the Anatomy Learning Experiences of Undergraduate Paramedic Students

A. Carnicelli, Anne-Marie M Williams, Dale G. Edwards
{"title":"Investigating the Anatomy Learning Experiences of Undergraduate Paramedic Students","authors":"A. Carnicelli, Anne-Marie M Williams, Dale G. Edwards","doi":"10.33151/ajp.19.1016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The study of human anatomy forms a foundational knowledge base essential for healthcare professional practice including paramedicine. However, little is known about the experiences and perceptions of undergraduate student paramedics towards learning anatomy. The aim of this study was to investigate this, utilising a questionnaire previously validated in medical students. Methods To explore anatomy learning experiences, a 32-item anatomy learning experiences questionnaire (ALEQ) modified for use with paramedicine students was distributed online to students enrolled in the Bachelor of Paramedic Practice at the University of Tasmania. Quantitative statistics were used to identify differences in responses between student groups. Cronbach's alpha assessed the reliability of the modified ALEQ. Results Fifty-one usable responses were obtained (20% response rate). Psychometric analysis demonstrated good overall reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.88). The students perceived several learning activities as positive including textbooks, online learning and practical classes. However, it was generally felt the amount of content to learn was daunting. Furthermore, the students indicated working with cadavers would be highly beneficial for their learning. The relevance of anatomy was also recognised as being important to future clinical practice. Conclusion Despite the low response rate, the modified ALEQ was a reliable instrument to investigate the anatomy learning experiences and perceptions of paramedicine students. Further research with a larger cohort is required to confirm the reliability and generalisability of the results.","PeriodicalId":340334,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.19.1016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction The study of human anatomy forms a foundational knowledge base essential for healthcare professional practice including paramedicine. However, little is known about the experiences and perceptions of undergraduate student paramedics towards learning anatomy. The aim of this study was to investigate this, utilising a questionnaire previously validated in medical students. Methods To explore anatomy learning experiences, a 32-item anatomy learning experiences questionnaire (ALEQ) modified for use with paramedicine students was distributed online to students enrolled in the Bachelor of Paramedic Practice at the University of Tasmania. Quantitative statistics were used to identify differences in responses between student groups. Cronbach's alpha assessed the reliability of the modified ALEQ. Results Fifty-one usable responses were obtained (20% response rate). Psychometric analysis demonstrated good overall reliability (Cronbach's alpha of 0.88). The students perceived several learning activities as positive including textbooks, online learning and practical classes. However, it was generally felt the amount of content to learn was daunting. Furthermore, the students indicated working with cadavers would be highly beneficial for their learning. The relevance of anatomy was also recognised as being important to future clinical practice. Conclusion Despite the low response rate, the modified ALEQ was a reliable instrument to investigate the anatomy learning experiences and perceptions of paramedicine students. Further research with a larger cohort is required to confirm the reliability and generalisability of the results.
护理本科学生解剖学学习经验调查
人体解剖学的研究形成了医疗保健专业实践包括辅助医学必不可少的基础知识基础。然而,很少有人知道的经验和看法,本科生护理人员对学习解剖学。本研究的目的是调查这一点,利用先前在医学生中验证的问卷。方法对塔斯马尼亚大学护理专业本科学生在线发放经修改的32项辅助医学学生解剖学学习经历问卷(ALEQ),以了解他们的解剖学学习经历。定量统计用于确定学生群体之间的反应差异。Cronbach’s alpha评估修改后的ALEQ的可靠性。结果共获得51份有效问卷,回收率为20%。心理测量分析显示了良好的总体信度(Cronbach's alpha为0.88)。学生们认为一些学习活动是积极的,包括教科书、在线学习和实践课程。然而,人们普遍认为要学习的内容数量令人望而生畏。此外,学生们表示,与尸体打交道对他们的学习非常有益。解剖学的相关性也被认为对未来的临床实践很重要。结论改进后的aliq问卷虽然应答率较低,但仍是一种可靠的调查医学生解剖学学习经历和认知的工具。需要对更大的队列进行进一步的研究,以确认结果的可靠性和普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信