Final Provisions

E. Guild, S. Peers, J. Tomkin
{"title":"Final Provisions","authors":"E. Guild, S. Peers, J. Tomkin","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198849384.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the final provisions of the citizens’ Directive, which do not concern a single specific issue. Rather, they concern the effective implementation of the Directive as a whole. They include provisions which are absolutely essential for the Directive to have any legal effect at all as well as those deemed necessary to ensure its effective implementation in practice. The most significant provision of these is Article 35, which concerns fraud or abuse of rights. This Article is unobjectionable to the extent that it confirms prior case law and merely reiterates that persons who do not qualify for the rights in the Directive cannot rely upon it. However, this statement begs the question as to who benefits from the rights in the first place. In the interests of legal certainty, it would be useful if the Court of Justice took an early opportunity to clarify the meaning of this clause.","PeriodicalId":338033,"journal":{"name":"The EU Citizenship Directive: A Commentary","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The EU Citizenship Directive: A Commentary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198849384.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores the final provisions of the citizens’ Directive, which do not concern a single specific issue. Rather, they concern the effective implementation of the Directive as a whole. They include provisions which are absolutely essential for the Directive to have any legal effect at all as well as those deemed necessary to ensure its effective implementation in practice. The most significant provision of these is Article 35, which concerns fraud or abuse of rights. This Article is unobjectionable to the extent that it confirms prior case law and merely reiterates that persons who do not qualify for the rights in the Directive cannot rely upon it. However, this statement begs the question as to who benefits from the rights in the first place. In the interests of legal certainty, it would be useful if the Court of Justice took an early opportunity to clarify the meaning of this clause.
最后条款
本章探讨了公民指令的最终条款,这些条款并不涉及单一的具体问题。相反,它们关系到整个指令的有效执行。它们包括对指令具有任何法律效力绝对必要的条款,以及被认为确保其在实践中有效执行所必需的条款。其中最重要的规定是关于欺诈或滥用权利的第35条。该条在某种程度上是无可争议的,因为它确认了以前的判例法,只是重申不符合《指令》权利资格的人不能依赖它。然而,这种说法回避了一个问题,即谁首先从这些权利中受益。为了法律上的确定性,如果法院尽早抓住机会澄清这一条款的含义,将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信