Asas Dominus Litis Bagi Kejaksaan dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Undang-Undang

Wajah Hukum Pub Date : 2022-10-14 DOI:10.33087/wjh.v6i2.950
B. Mulya, Ulya Kencana, Cholidi Cholidi, M. Zuhdi
{"title":"Asas Dominus Litis Bagi Kejaksaan dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Undang-Undang","authors":"B. Mulya, Ulya Kencana, Cholidi Cholidi, M. Zuhdi","doi":"10.33087/wjh.v6i2.950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Criminal Procedure Code is a generally accepted procedural law for criminal acts in Indonesia. It is regulated that those who have the right to carry out prosecutions are the Public Prosecutor or the Prosecutor. There is an element of legal uncertainty regarding his authority in prosecuting corruption crimes, for example. The separation of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission from the Prosecutor's Office, specifically as a claimant. In fact, the prosecution is on behalf of the Public Prosecutor or the Prosecutor. With the dominus-litis principle, expressly states that there is no other institution other than the Prosecutor as the Public Prosecutor who has the absolute right to sue. This study examines the principle of dominus litis for the prosecutor in the prosecution of criminal acts based on the law. The research method, the type of normative research with a descriptive approach. It was concluded that it was necessary to clarify the position of the Indonesian Prosecutor's Office as an executive agency. According to the rules, the Prosecutor's Office should be under the same roof as the judiciary. or the sake of the presence of legitimacy for the Prosecutor's Office itself. So that there is no uncertainty of authority for the Public Prosecutor in prosecuting criminal cases. Oleh karena itu perlu dibuat peraturan baru terkait dengan Kejaksaan RI untuk menuntut kasus tindak pidana berdasarkan asas dominus litis. Where the Prosecutor's Office is the owner of the dominus litis authority in terms of prosecution.","PeriodicalId":283705,"journal":{"name":"Wajah Hukum","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wajah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Criminal Procedure Code is a generally accepted procedural law for criminal acts in Indonesia. It is regulated that those who have the right to carry out prosecutions are the Public Prosecutor or the Prosecutor. There is an element of legal uncertainty regarding his authority in prosecuting corruption crimes, for example. The separation of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission from the Prosecutor's Office, specifically as a claimant. In fact, the prosecution is on behalf of the Public Prosecutor or the Prosecutor. With the dominus-litis principle, expressly states that there is no other institution other than the Prosecutor as the Public Prosecutor who has the absolute right to sue. This study examines the principle of dominus litis for the prosecutor in the prosecution of criminal acts based on the law. The research method, the type of normative research with a descriptive approach. It was concluded that it was necessary to clarify the position of the Indonesian Prosecutor's Office as an executive agency. According to the rules, the Prosecutor's Office should be under the same roof as the judiciary. or the sake of the presence of legitimacy for the Prosecutor's Office itself. So that there is no uncertainty of authority for the Public Prosecutor in prosecuting criminal cases. Oleh karena itu perlu dibuat peraturan baru terkait dengan Kejaksaan RI untuk menuntut kasus tindak pidana berdasarkan asas dominus litis. Where the Prosecutor's Office is the owner of the dominus litis authority in terms of prosecution.
《刑事诉讼法》是印度尼西亚普遍接受的刑事行为程序法。根据规定,有权进行起诉的人是公诉人或检察官。例如,他在起诉腐败犯罪方面的权力存在法律上的不确定性。消除腐败委员会的权力与检察官办公室的权力分离,特别是作为索赔人。事实上,控方代表的是公诉人或检察官。以统治权原则明确指出,除了检察官以外,没有其他机构作为检察官拥有起诉的绝对权利。本文从法律的角度考察了刑事诉讼中检察官的主体权利原则。研究方法上,采用规范性研究的类型,采用描述性研究的方法。会议的结论是,有必要澄清印度尼西亚检察官办公室作为一个执行机构的立场。根据规则,检察官办公室应与司法部门在同一屋檐下。或者为了检察官办公室本身的合法性而存在。这样,检察官在起诉刑事案件时就没有权力的不确定性。Oleh karena itu perlu dibuperaturan baru terkait dengan Kejaksaan和RI untuk menuntuk kasus tindak pidana berdasarkan和dominus litis。检控署在检控方面拥有诉讼权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信