An overview and comparison of voting methods for pattern recognition

M. V. Erp, L. Vuurpijl, Lambert Schomaker
{"title":"An overview and comparison of voting methods for pattern recognition","authors":"M. V. Erp, L. Vuurpijl, Lambert Schomaker","doi":"10.1109/IWFHR.2002.1030908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In pattern recognition, there is a growing use of multiple classifier combinations with the goal to increase recognition performance. In many cases, plurality voting is a part of the combination process. In this article, we discuss and test several well known voting methods from politics and economics on classifier combination in order to see if an alternative to the simple plurality vote exists. We found that, assuming a number of prerequisites, better methods are available, that are comparatively simple and fast.","PeriodicalId":114017,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Eighth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"209","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Eighth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWFHR.2002.1030908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 209

Abstract

In pattern recognition, there is a growing use of multiple classifier combinations with the goal to increase recognition performance. In many cases, plurality voting is a part of the combination process. In this article, we discuss and test several well known voting methods from politics and economics on classifier combination in order to see if an alternative to the simple plurality vote exists. We found that, assuming a number of prerequisites, better methods are available, that are comparatively simple and fast.
模式识别中投票方法的综述与比较
在模式识别中,越来越多地使用多个分类器组合来提高识别性能。在许多情况下,多数投票是合并过程的一部分。在本文中,我们讨论和测试了政治和经济学中几种众所周知的分类器组合投票方法,以了解是否存在简单多数投票的替代方法。我们发现,只要具备一些先决条件,就有更好的方法,而且比较简单和快速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信