Truth

B. Applebaum
{"title":"Truth","authors":"B. Applebaum","doi":"10.1163/9789004400467_029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When Audre Lorde wrote that “the Master’s tools will never dismantle the Master’s house” (Lorde, 1984, p. 110), she was speaking from her experiences as a Black, lesbian feminist and she was critiquing white feminists for their heterosexual, white bias. In their allegedly progressive attempts to eliminate sexism, white feminists employed the logic of ignoring difference and, consequently, reinforced the very systems of oppression and privilege they claimed to want to dismantle. Lorde’s famous quote highlights the dilemma and the dangers of challenging injustice with the Master’s tools—tools, however, that we might not be able to live without. The dilemma I want to address in this chapter involves the role of truth in social justice education. On the one hand, I will argue that an exclusive focus on truth might be one of the Master’s tools that can obscure what discourse does and, thus, protect dominance from contestation. On the other hand, truth-talk cannot be abandoned as it plays an important role in regards to the credibility of what the marginalized are trying to tell the systemically privileged about their experiences with oppression. When should questions of truth be suspended and when do they matter? This dilemma is a noteworthy challenge for philosophers of education because, as Jose Medina and David Wood (2005) contend, “There is no topic more central to philosophy than truth” (p. 1). While debates about the multiple meanings and complex issues surrounding truth have occupied a special place in the history of philosophical inquiry, these debates will not be rehearsed here. Instead my aim is to examine whether an exclusive focus on truth might make it difficult for systemically privileged subjects to hear the truth of marginalized experience. I use two stories as a canvas upon which to build my argument that an exclusive focus on truth can undermine what the systemically dominant can hear. Story 1: Last year, the Black Lives Matter Movement asked Martin O’Malley, the white former governor of Maryland and then Democratic presidential","PeriodicalId":179441,"journal":{"name":"Keywords in Radical Philosophy and Education","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Keywords in Radical Philosophy and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004400467_029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

When Audre Lorde wrote that “the Master’s tools will never dismantle the Master’s house” (Lorde, 1984, p. 110), she was speaking from her experiences as a Black, lesbian feminist and she was critiquing white feminists for their heterosexual, white bias. In their allegedly progressive attempts to eliminate sexism, white feminists employed the logic of ignoring difference and, consequently, reinforced the very systems of oppression and privilege they claimed to want to dismantle. Lorde’s famous quote highlights the dilemma and the dangers of challenging injustice with the Master’s tools—tools, however, that we might not be able to live without. The dilemma I want to address in this chapter involves the role of truth in social justice education. On the one hand, I will argue that an exclusive focus on truth might be one of the Master’s tools that can obscure what discourse does and, thus, protect dominance from contestation. On the other hand, truth-talk cannot be abandoned as it plays an important role in regards to the credibility of what the marginalized are trying to tell the systemically privileged about their experiences with oppression. When should questions of truth be suspended and when do they matter? This dilemma is a noteworthy challenge for philosophers of education because, as Jose Medina and David Wood (2005) contend, “There is no topic more central to philosophy than truth” (p. 1). While debates about the multiple meanings and complex issues surrounding truth have occupied a special place in the history of philosophical inquiry, these debates will not be rehearsed here. Instead my aim is to examine whether an exclusive focus on truth might make it difficult for systemically privileged subjects to hear the truth of marginalized experience. I use two stories as a canvas upon which to build my argument that an exclusive focus on truth can undermine what the systemically dominant can hear. Story 1: Last year, the Black Lives Matter Movement asked Martin O’Malley, the white former governor of Maryland and then Democratic presidential
真理
当奥德丽•洛德(Audre Lorde)写道“大师的工具永远不会拆除大师的房子”(Lorde, 1984,第110页)时,她是从自己作为黑人女同性恋女权主义者的经历出发,批评白人女权主义者的异性恋白人偏见。在他们所谓的消除性别歧视的进步尝试中,白人女权主义者采用了忽视差异的逻辑,结果强化了他们声称想要拆除的压迫和特权制度。洛德的名言强调了用大师的工具来挑战不公正的困境和危险——然而,这些工具可能是我们无法离开的。在这一章中,我想解决的困境涉及真理在社会正义教育中的作用。一方面,我认为对真理的独家关注可能是大师的工具之一,它可以模糊话语的作用,从而保护主导地位免受争议。另一方面,实话实说不能被抛弃,因为它在边缘化群体试图告诉系统特权群体他们受压迫经历的可信度方面发挥着重要作用。什么时候应该搁置关于真相的问题,什么时候它们重要?对于教育哲学家来说,这种困境是一个值得注意的挑战,因为正如何塞·梅迪纳和大卫·伍德(2005)所主张的那样,“没有比真理更重要的哲学主题”(第1页)。尽管围绕真理的多重意义和复杂问题的辩论在哲学探究的历史上占据了特殊的地位,但这些辩论将不会在这里进行重述。相反,我的目的是研究对真相的独家关注是否会使系统特权主体难以听到边缘化经历的真相。我用两个故事作为画布来构建我的论点,即对真相的独家关注会破坏系统支配者所能听到的东西。故事1:去年,“黑人的命也重要”运动邀请了马丁·奥马利,他是马里兰州的前白人州长,后来成为民主党总统
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信