Competitive Landscape Shift: When does a competitor matter?

Takhaui Kamzabek
{"title":"Competitive Landscape Shift: When does a competitor matter?","authors":"Takhaui Kamzabek","doi":"10.47344/iysw.v9i0.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research broadens the Strategic Entrepreneurship construct. This research aims to clarify the relationship between strategic and entrepreneurial activities with competitive landscape changes by questioning is the firm limited to the current boundary of competition? By integrating the competitive dynamics and multimarket competition theory, the study finds the correlative relationship between Strategic Entrepreneurship activities with competitive landscape shifts. The study found that explorative activities do not have any commonalities with traditional competitors. Also, the high involvement competitive tension with rival causes the firm to go beyond its current landscape, which enables the incumbent firm to increase the market commonality with new competitors and traditional competitors. The research also looking for the anomalies that emerged within the process of it and give several explanations for that. By analyzing the M&A history (between 1995 - 2019) of big players in the consumer goods industry which has a similar core (Procter & Gamble and Unilever) I found the support to the hypothesis.Keywords:  explorative activities, exploitative activities, competitive tension, competitive landscape","PeriodicalId":117909,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of International Young Scholars Workshop","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of International Young Scholars Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47344/iysw.v9i0.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research broadens the Strategic Entrepreneurship construct. This research aims to clarify the relationship between strategic and entrepreneurial activities with competitive landscape changes by questioning is the firm limited to the current boundary of competition? By integrating the competitive dynamics and multimarket competition theory, the study finds the correlative relationship between Strategic Entrepreneurship activities with competitive landscape shifts. The study found that explorative activities do not have any commonalities with traditional competitors. Also, the high involvement competitive tension with rival causes the firm to go beyond its current landscape, which enables the incumbent firm to increase the market commonality with new competitors and traditional competitors. The research also looking for the anomalies that emerged within the process of it and give several explanations for that. By analyzing the M&A history (between 1995 - 2019) of big players in the consumer goods industry which has a similar core (Procter & Gamble and Unilever) I found the support to the hypothesis.Keywords:  explorative activities, exploitative activities, competitive tension, competitive landscape
竞争格局转变:竞争对手何时重要?
本研究拓宽了战略创业的结构。本研究旨在通过企业是否局限于当前的竞争边界来澄清战略和创业活动与竞争格局变化之间的关系。通过整合竞争动力学和多市场竞争理论,研究发现了战略创业活动与竞争格局变化之间的相关关系。研究发现,探索性活动与传统竞争对手没有任何共性。同时,与竞争对手之间的高度介入竞争紧张导致企业超越其现有格局,这使得在位企业能够增加与新竞争者和传统竞争者的市场共性。该研究还寻找了在此过程中出现的异常现象,并对此给出了几种解释。通过分析具有类似核心的消费品行业(宝洁和联合利华)的大型企业的并购历史(1995年至2019年),我发现了对这一假设的支持。关键词:探索性活动,剥削性活动,竞争张力,竞争格局
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信