SLICE: Reviving regions-based pruning for reverse k nearest neighbors queries

Shiyu Yang, M. A. Cheema, Xuemin Lin, Ying Zhang
{"title":"SLICE: Reviving regions-based pruning for reverse k nearest neighbors queries","authors":"Shiyu Yang, M. A. Cheema, Xuemin Lin, Ying Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.2014.6816698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given a set of facilities and a set of users, a reverse k nearest neighbors (RkNN) query q returns every user for which the query facility is one of the k-closest facilities. Due to its importance, RkNN query has received significant research attention in the past few years. Almost all of the existing techniques adopt a pruning-and-verification framework. Regions-based pruning and half-space pruning are the two most notable pruning strategies. The half-space based approach prunes a larger area and is generally believed to be superior. Influenced by this perception, almost all existing RkNN algorithms utilize and improve the half-space pruning strategy. We observe the weaknesses and strengths of both strategies and discover that the regions-based pruning has certain strengths that have not been exploited in the past. Motivated by this, we present a new RkNN algorithm called SLICE that utilizes the strength of regions-based pruning and overcomes its limitations. Our extensive experimental study on synthetic and real data sets demonstrate that SLICE is significantly more efficient than the existing algorithms. We also provide a detailed theoretical analysis to analyze various aspects of our algorithm such as I/O cost, the unpruned area, and the cost of its verification phase etc. The experimental study validates our theoretical analysis.","PeriodicalId":159130,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2014.6816698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Given a set of facilities and a set of users, a reverse k nearest neighbors (RkNN) query q returns every user for which the query facility is one of the k-closest facilities. Due to its importance, RkNN query has received significant research attention in the past few years. Almost all of the existing techniques adopt a pruning-and-verification framework. Regions-based pruning and half-space pruning are the two most notable pruning strategies. The half-space based approach prunes a larger area and is generally believed to be superior. Influenced by this perception, almost all existing RkNN algorithms utilize and improve the half-space pruning strategy. We observe the weaknesses and strengths of both strategies and discover that the regions-based pruning has certain strengths that have not been exploited in the past. Motivated by this, we present a new RkNN algorithm called SLICE that utilizes the strength of regions-based pruning and overcomes its limitations. Our extensive experimental study on synthetic and real data sets demonstrate that SLICE is significantly more efficient than the existing algorithms. We also provide a detailed theoretical analysis to analyze various aspects of our algorithm such as I/O cost, the unpruned area, and the cost of its verification phase etc. The experimental study validates our theoretical analysis.
SLICE:为反向k近邻查询恢复基于区域的修剪
给定一组设施和一组用户,反向k近邻(RkNN)查询q返回查询设施是k个最近设施之一的所有用户。由于其重要性,RkNN查询在过去的几年里受到了很大的研究关注。几乎所有现有的技术都采用了修剪和验证框架。基于区域的剪枝和半空间剪枝是两种最显著的剪枝策略。基于半空间的方法修剪面积更大,通常被认为是优越的。受这种感知的影响,几乎所有现有的RkNN算法都利用并改进了半空间剪枝策略。我们观察了这两种策略的优缺点,发现基于区域的修剪具有某些过去未被利用的优势。基于此,我们提出了一种新的RkNN算法SLICE,该算法利用了基于区域的修剪的强度并克服了其局限性。我们对合成和真实数据集的广泛实验研究表明,SLICE比现有算法显着提高效率。我们还提供了详细的理论分析来分析我们的算法的各个方面,如I/O成本,未修剪面积和验证阶段的成本等。实验研究验证了我们的理论分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信