Mandeville, Mourning and National Myths: William Godwin's Civil War Novel and the Use of History

R. Thomas
{"title":"Mandeville, Mourning and National Myths: William Godwin's Civil War Novel and the Use of History","authors":"R. Thomas","doi":"10.18573/romtext.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mandeville (1817) is the second of William Godwin’s historical novels, and is set during the period of the English Commonwealth (1649–60). Readers at the time of its publication made comparisons with the ‘German school’ of novel writing, linking it with both the Gothic and sturm-und-drang fictional modes. Modern critics have recognised it as a work exploring psychological and cultural trauma, the aftereffects of war on the generation that came after. Godwin cited Charles Brockden Brown’s Wieland (1798) and Joanna Bailie’s De Monfort (1798) as major influences on the novel, and this essay will attempt to use these texts as a vector to explore the direction of Godwin’s ideas.\nLike all of Godwin’s (mature) novels, Mandeville is a first-person narrative—and this essay will argue that here Godwin specifically uses this as a nod towards historical memoir, a genre that shaped understanding of the Civil War and Commonwealth period during Godwin’s lifetime. The novel’s narration is characterised by its paranoia and self-destructive violence, steeped in the era’s political and religious tribalism. In the context of Godwin’s ideas on the purpose of historical writing, fiction, and critical reading, this turn towards memoir can thus be seen as a challenge to the public understanding of the period (and its reliance on implicitly dubious memoir) and the cultural issues of the seventeenth century that persisted through to Godwin’s time. ","PeriodicalId":120634,"journal":{"name":"Romantic Textualities: Literature and Print Culture, 1780–1840","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romantic Textualities: Literature and Print Culture, 1780–1840","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18573/romtext.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mandeville (1817) is the second of William Godwin’s historical novels, and is set during the period of the English Commonwealth (1649–60). Readers at the time of its publication made comparisons with the ‘German school’ of novel writing, linking it with both the Gothic and sturm-und-drang fictional modes. Modern critics have recognised it as a work exploring psychological and cultural trauma, the aftereffects of war on the generation that came after. Godwin cited Charles Brockden Brown’s Wieland (1798) and Joanna Bailie’s De Monfort (1798) as major influences on the novel, and this essay will attempt to use these texts as a vector to explore the direction of Godwin’s ideas. Like all of Godwin’s (mature) novels, Mandeville is a first-person narrative—and this essay will argue that here Godwin specifically uses this as a nod towards historical memoir, a genre that shaped understanding of the Civil War and Commonwealth period during Godwin’s lifetime. The novel’s narration is characterised by its paranoia and self-destructive violence, steeped in the era’s political and religious tribalism. In the context of Godwin’s ideas on the purpose of historical writing, fiction, and critical reading, this turn towards memoir can thus be seen as a challenge to the public understanding of the period (and its reliance on implicitly dubious memoir) and the cultural issues of the seventeenth century that persisted through to Godwin’s time. 
曼德维尔、哀悼与民族神话:威廉·戈德温的内战小说与历史的运用
《曼德维尔》(1817)是威廉·戈德温的第二部历史小说,故事发生在英联邦时期(1649-60)。这本书出版时,读者把它与“德国学派”的小说写作作了比较,把它与哥特式和狂飙式小说模式联系起来。现代评论家认为这是一部探索心理和文化创伤的作品,以及战争对后代人的影响。戈德温引用了查尔斯·布罗克登·布朗的《维兰》(1798)和乔安娜·贝利的《德·蒙福特》(1798)作为对小说的主要影响,本文将试图以这些文本为载体来探索戈德温思想的方向。就像戈德温的所有(成熟的)小说一样,曼德维尔是第一人称叙事——本文将论证戈德温在这里特别使用了这一点,作为对历史回忆录的致敬,这种类型在戈德温的一生中塑造了对内战和联邦时期的理解。小说的叙事特点是偏执和自我毁灭的暴力,沉浸在那个时代的政治和宗教部落主义中。在戈德温关于历史写作、小说和批判性阅读目的的思想背景下,这种向回忆录的转变可以被视为对公众对这一时期(及其对隐含可疑的回忆录的依赖)和17世纪一直持续到戈德温时代的文化问题的理解的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信