TAPAS at SemEval-2021 Task 9: Reasoning over tables with intermediate pre-training

Thomas Müller, Julian Martin Eisenschlos, Syrine Krichene
{"title":"TAPAS at SemEval-2021 Task 9: Reasoning over tables with intermediate pre-training","authors":"Thomas Müller, Julian Martin Eisenschlos, Syrine Krichene","doi":"10.18653/v1/2021.semeval-1.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present the TAPAS contribution to the Shared Task on Statement Verification and Evidence Finding with Tables (SemEval 2021 Task 9, Wang et al. (2021)). SEM TAB FACT Task A is a classification task of recognizing if a statement is entailed, neutral or refuted by the content of a given table. We adopt the binary TAPAS model of Eisenschlos et al. (2020) to this task. We learn two binary classification models: A first model to predict if a statement is neutral or non-neutral and a second one to predict if it is entailed or refuted. As the shared task training set contains only entailed or refuted examples, we generate artificial neutral examples to train the first model. Both models are pre-trained using a MASKLM objective, intermediate counter-factual and synthetic data (Eisenschlos et al., 2020) and TABFACT (Chen et al., 2020), a large table entailment dataset. We find that the artificial neutral examples are somewhat effective at training the first model, achieving 68.03 test F1 versus the 60.47 of a majority baseline. For the second stage, we find that the pre-training on the intermediate data and TABFACT improves the results over MASKLM pre-training (68.03 vs 57.01).","PeriodicalId":444285,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.semeval-1.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

We present the TAPAS contribution to the Shared Task on Statement Verification and Evidence Finding with Tables (SemEval 2021 Task 9, Wang et al. (2021)). SEM TAB FACT Task A is a classification task of recognizing if a statement is entailed, neutral or refuted by the content of a given table. We adopt the binary TAPAS model of Eisenschlos et al. (2020) to this task. We learn two binary classification models: A first model to predict if a statement is neutral or non-neutral and a second one to predict if it is entailed or refuted. As the shared task training set contains only entailed or refuted examples, we generate artificial neutral examples to train the first model. Both models are pre-trained using a MASKLM objective, intermediate counter-factual and synthetic data (Eisenschlos et al., 2020) and TABFACT (Chen et al., 2020), a large table entailment dataset. We find that the artificial neutral examples are somewhat effective at training the first model, achieving 68.03 test F1 versus the 60.47 of a majority baseline. For the second stage, we find that the pre-training on the intermediate data and TABFACT improves the results over MASKLM pre-training (68.03 vs 57.01).
任务9:中级预训练的表推理
我们介绍了TAPAS对基于表的陈述验证和证据发现共享任务的贡献(SemEval 2021 Task 9, Wang et al.(2021))。SEM TAB FACT任务A是一个分类任务,用于识别一个语句是否被给定表的内容所包含、中立或反驳。我们采用Eisenschlos等人(2020)的二元TAPAS模型来完成这项任务。我们学习了两个二元分类模型:第一个模型预测一个陈述是中立的还是非中立的,第二个模型预测它是必然的还是被反驳的。由于共享任务训练集只包含包含或反驳的示例,我们生成人工中性示例来训练第一个模型。这两个模型都使用MASKLM目标、中间反事实和合成数据(Eisenschlos等人,2020)和TABFACT (Chen等人,2020)(一个大型表隐含数据集)进行预训练。我们发现人工中性样例在训练第一个模型时有些有效,达到68.03测试F1,而大多数基线的测试F1为60.47。在第二阶段,我们发现在中间数据和TABFACT上的预训练比MASKLM预训练的结果更好(68.03 vs 57.01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信