J. Kang, I. Park, Yun Chang, S. Sung, Y. Park, S. Cho, Yun‐mi Paek, Tae‐in Choi
{"title":"The Evaluation of Workplace Obesity Intervention Program using Six Sigma Methodology","authors":"J. Kang, I. Park, Yun Chang, S. Sung, Y. Park, S. Cho, Yun‐mi Paek, Tae‐in Choi","doi":"10.7570/KJO.2011.20.4.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was performed to develop, evaluate, and implement an effective obesity intervention program using the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology. Methods: A workplace obesity intervention program involving 100 obese male workers (% body fat ≥ 25% and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m ) was conducted five times (20~30 minutes each time) for 12 weeks. The intervention involved a face-to-face counseling. Results: The selected critical to quality (CTQ) according to the Define phase was % body fat. The subjects’ mean % body fat, measured during Measure phase, was 27.8% and the sigma level was 0.54σ. According to the analyse phase, the total energy intake (r = 0.417; P < 0.001) and frequency of exercise (r = -0.317; P < 0.01) were considered as potential factors influencing % body fat. Therefore, these factors were implemented in the intervention protocol. By performing six sigma methodologies, % body fat was significantly decreased from 27.8% to 26.2%, and the sigma level was improved from 0.54σ to 1.27σ. Conclusions: The six sigma methodology was well suited for implementing a more efficient and cost-effective intervention, for enhancing the quality of the intervention, and for facilitating the successful adoption of the process and protocol into practice.","PeriodicalId":432482,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Obesity","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7570/KJO.2011.20.4.193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study was performed to develop, evaluate, and implement an effective obesity intervention program using the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology. Methods: A workplace obesity intervention program involving 100 obese male workers (% body fat ≥ 25% and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m ) was conducted five times (20~30 minutes each time) for 12 weeks. The intervention involved a face-to-face counseling. Results: The selected critical to quality (CTQ) according to the Define phase was % body fat. The subjects’ mean % body fat, measured during Measure phase, was 27.8% and the sigma level was 0.54σ. According to the analyse phase, the total energy intake (r = 0.417; P < 0.001) and frequency of exercise (r = -0.317; P < 0.01) were considered as potential factors influencing % body fat. Therefore, these factors were implemented in the intervention protocol. By performing six sigma methodologies, % body fat was significantly decreased from 27.8% to 26.2%, and the sigma level was improved from 0.54σ to 1.27σ. Conclusions: The six sigma methodology was well suited for implementing a more efficient and cost-effective intervention, for enhancing the quality of the intervention, and for facilitating the successful adoption of the process and protocol into practice.