The Evaluation of Workplace Obesity Intervention Program using Six Sigma Methodology

J. Kang, I. Park, Yun Chang, S. Sung, Y. Park, S. Cho, Yun‐mi Paek, Tae‐in Choi
{"title":"The Evaluation of Workplace Obesity Intervention Program using Six Sigma Methodology","authors":"J. Kang, I. Park, Yun Chang, S. Sung, Y. Park, S. Cho, Yun‐mi Paek, Tae‐in Choi","doi":"10.7570/KJO.2011.20.4.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was performed to develop, evaluate, and implement an effective obesity intervention program using the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology. Methods: A workplace obesity intervention program involving 100 obese male workers (% body fat ≥ 25% and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m ) was conducted five times (20~30 minutes each time) for 12 weeks. The intervention involved a face-to-face counseling. Results: The selected critical to quality (CTQ) according to the Define phase was % body fat. The subjects’ mean % body fat, measured during Measure phase, was 27.8% and the sigma level was 0.54σ. According to the analyse phase, the total energy intake (r = 0.417; P < 0.001) and frequency of exercise (r = -0.317; P < 0.01) were considered as potential factors influencing % body fat. Therefore, these factors were implemented in the intervention protocol. By performing six sigma methodologies, % body fat was significantly decreased from 27.8% to 26.2%, and the sigma level was improved from 0.54σ to 1.27σ. Conclusions: The six sigma methodology was well suited for implementing a more efficient and cost-effective intervention, for enhancing the quality of the intervention, and for facilitating the successful adoption of the process and protocol into practice.","PeriodicalId":432482,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Obesity","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7570/KJO.2011.20.4.193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was performed to develop, evaluate, and implement an effective obesity intervention program using the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology. Methods: A workplace obesity intervention program involving 100 obese male workers (% body fat ≥ 25% and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m ) was conducted five times (20~30 minutes each time) for 12 weeks. The intervention involved a face-to-face counseling. Results: The selected critical to quality (CTQ) according to the Define phase was % body fat. The subjects’ mean % body fat, measured during Measure phase, was 27.8% and the sigma level was 0.54σ. According to the analyse phase, the total energy intake (r = 0.417; P < 0.001) and frequency of exercise (r = -0.317; P < 0.01) were considered as potential factors influencing % body fat. Therefore, these factors were implemented in the intervention protocol. By performing six sigma methodologies, % body fat was significantly decreased from 27.8% to 26.2%, and the sigma level was improved from 0.54σ to 1.27σ. Conclusions: The six sigma methodology was well suited for implementing a more efficient and cost-effective intervention, for enhancing the quality of the intervention, and for facilitating the successful adoption of the process and protocol into practice.
用六西格玛方法评价工作场所肥胖干预计划
背景:本研究采用DMAIC(定义、测量、分析、改善、控制)方法制定、评估和实施有效的肥胖干预方案。方法:对100名肥胖男性工人(体脂%≥25%,BMI≥25 kg/m)进行5次(每次20~30分钟)的工作场所肥胖干预,为期12周。干预包括面对面的咨询。结果:根据定义阶段选择的临界质量(CTQ)为体脂%。测量阶段的体脂率平均值为27.8%,sigma水平为0.54σ。根据分析阶段,总能量摄入(r = 0.417;P < 0.001)和运动频率(r = -0.317;P < 0.01)被认为是影响%体脂的潜在因素。因此,在干预方案中实施了这些因素。采用六西格玛方法,体脂率从27.8%显著下降到26.2%,西格玛水平从0.54σ提高到1.27σ。结论:六西格玛方法非常适合于实施更有效和更具成本效益的干预,提高干预质量,并促进过程和方案的成功采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信