Big Data as “Practical Ontology”: The Ontotheology Underlying the Interpretation of Reality as Data

Guilherme Silva, Tales Tomaz
{"title":"Big Data as “Practical Ontology”: The Ontotheology Underlying the Interpretation of Reality as Data","authors":"Guilherme Silva, Tales Tomaz","doi":"10.53631/athena.2021.16.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the emergence of a “practical ontology” in some of the most triumphalist discourses on Big Data. Such an interpretation can be drawn from the Heideggerian critique of ontotheology, a term he used as an equivalent to Western metaphysics. Following his perspective, the article argues that the reduction of reality to data, as in many Big Data discourses, means putting functionality as the fundamental aspect of beings, hence – the idea of a practical ontology. The Heideggerian critique of ontotheology, however, not only makes the ontological core of Big Data’s practical discourses more transparent but also points out the theoretical limits of that ontology and, furthermore, of most discourses around Big Data. It could be said that eventually Big Data’s practical ontology conceals the very moment of unconcealment of beings as data, undermining a proper comprehension of its object of analysis – the data.","PeriodicalId":241380,"journal":{"name":"Athena: filosofijos studijos","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Athena: filosofijos studijos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53631/athena.2021.16.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article discusses the emergence of a “practical ontology” in some of the most triumphalist discourses on Big Data. Such an interpretation can be drawn from the Heideggerian critique of ontotheology, a term he used as an equivalent to Western metaphysics. Following his perspective, the article argues that the reduction of reality to data, as in many Big Data discourses, means putting functionality as the fundamental aspect of beings, hence – the idea of a practical ontology. The Heideggerian critique of ontotheology, however, not only makes the ontological core of Big Data’s practical discourses more transparent but also points out the theoretical limits of that ontology and, furthermore, of most discourses around Big Data. It could be said that eventually Big Data’s practical ontology conceals the very moment of unconcealment of beings as data, undermining a proper comprehension of its object of analysis – the data.
作为“实践本体论”的大数据:将现实解读为数据的本体论
这篇文章讨论了“实践本体论”在一些关于大数据的必胜主义话语中的出现。这样的解释可以从海德格尔对本体神学的批判中得出,他将本体神学作为西方形而上学的等价物。根据他的观点,文章认为,将现实还原为数据,就像在许多大数据话语中一样,意味着将功能作为存在的基本方面,因此-实践本体论的想法。然而,海德格尔对本体论的批判不仅使大数据实践话语的本体论核心更加清晰,而且指出了该本体论乃至大多数大数据话语的理论局限性。可以说,大数据的实践本体论最终掩盖了作为数据的存在被揭露的时刻,破坏了对其分析对象——数据的正确理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信