RESULTS OF PAIN TREATMENT IN MILITARY MEDICAL CLINICAL CENTERS FOR COMBATANTS AFTER GUNSHOT WOUNDS

V. Horoshko, I. Kuchyn
{"title":"RESULTS OF PAIN TREATMENT IN MILITARY MEDICAL CLINICAL CENTERS FOR COMBATANTS AFTER GUNSHOT WOUNDS","authors":"V. Horoshko, I. Kuchyn","doi":"10.25284/2519-2078.2(103).2023.284625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resume. Unfortunately, the treatment of combatants with gunshot wounds does not end with wound healing. In 66.7 %-73.1 % of these patients, pain becomes chronic and affects quality of life. Therefore, studying the results of pain treatment in combatants after gunshot wounds in military medical clinical centers can help identify weaknesses on the way to improving the results of treatment of this category of patients. \nObjective. To study the results of treatment of combatants' pain after gunshot wounds in military medical clinical centres. \nMethods. The data on the results of treatment of 769 combatants with gunshot wounds after combat operations are presented. The intensity of pain during treatment was monitored using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Also, the time interval between analgesia was recorded. The groups were compared by the Mann-Whitney test and the chi-square test, taking into account the correction for continuity. To test the distribution of quantitative indicators for normality, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used, and to analyse the dynamics of indicators, the Friedman test for related samples was used, and a posteriori comparison was performed using the Bonferroni correction. \nResults. On admission, the VAS pain intensity in the 2 groups was practically the same and met the criteria of moderate and severe pain, here the number of points ranged from 4 to 7, which indicates the lack of quality pain control and low effectiveness of analgesia in the preliminary stages or during medical evacuation. on the 14th day after injury, the VAS pain intensity practically corresponded to 2 points – mild pain, which indicates stable pain control and sufficiently high-quality pain treatment. However, on the 9th day of observation (p=0.009, and then <0.001), there was a difference, which is most likely due to the number of injured anatomical areas of the patient. The intervals between anesthetizations gradually increased. However, from the 10th day of observation there is a difference between the groups (p<0.001). \nConclusion: The data obtained indicate that at the stage of treatment in military mobile hospitals, from which combatants are evacuated to military medical clinical centres, as well as during evacuation, more attention should be paid to the issue of pain management, because the lack of quality pain control between treatment stages is one of the factors that affects the frequency of pain chronicity.","PeriodicalId":306479,"journal":{"name":"PAIN, ANAESTHESIA &amp; INTENSIVE CARE","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN, ANAESTHESIA &amp; INTENSIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.2(103).2023.284625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resume. Unfortunately, the treatment of combatants with gunshot wounds does not end with wound healing. In 66.7 %-73.1 % of these patients, pain becomes chronic and affects quality of life. Therefore, studying the results of pain treatment in combatants after gunshot wounds in military medical clinical centers can help identify weaknesses on the way to improving the results of treatment of this category of patients. Objective. To study the results of treatment of combatants' pain after gunshot wounds in military medical clinical centres. Methods. The data on the results of treatment of 769 combatants with gunshot wounds after combat operations are presented. The intensity of pain during treatment was monitored using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Also, the time interval between analgesia was recorded. The groups were compared by the Mann-Whitney test and the chi-square test, taking into account the correction for continuity. To test the distribution of quantitative indicators for normality, the Shapiro-Wilk test was used, and to analyse the dynamics of indicators, the Friedman test for related samples was used, and a posteriori comparison was performed using the Bonferroni correction. Results. On admission, the VAS pain intensity in the 2 groups was practically the same and met the criteria of moderate and severe pain, here the number of points ranged from 4 to 7, which indicates the lack of quality pain control and low effectiveness of analgesia in the preliminary stages or during medical evacuation. on the 14th day after injury, the VAS pain intensity practically corresponded to 2 points – mild pain, which indicates stable pain control and sufficiently high-quality pain treatment. However, on the 9th day of observation (p=0.009, and then <0.001), there was a difference, which is most likely due to the number of injured anatomical areas of the patient. The intervals between anesthetizations gradually increased. However, from the 10th day of observation there is a difference between the groups (p<0.001). Conclusion: The data obtained indicate that at the stage of treatment in military mobile hospitals, from which combatants are evacuated to military medical clinical centres, as well as during evacuation, more attention should be paid to the issue of pain management, because the lack of quality pain control between treatment stages is one of the factors that affects the frequency of pain chronicity.
军事医疗临床中心对战斗人员枪伤后疼痛的治疗效果
重新开始不幸的是,对受枪伤的战斗人员的治疗并没有随着伤口愈合而结束。在66.7% - 73.1%的患者中,疼痛变为慢性并影响生活质量。因此,研究军事医疗临床中心对战斗人员枪伤后疼痛的治疗效果,有助于在提高这类患者的治疗效果的过程中找出弱点。目标。研究在军事医疗临床中心治疗战斗人员枪伤后疼痛的结果。方法。本文介绍了769名战斗人员在战斗行动后枪伤的治疗结果数据。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)监测治疗期间的疼痛强度。同时记录镇痛间隔时间。各组间比较采用Mann-Whitney检验和卡方检验,并考虑连续性校正。为了检验定量指标的分布是否符合正态性,采用Shapiro-Wilk检验;为了分析指标的动态,采用相关样本的Friedman检验,并采用Bonferroni校正进行后验比较。结果。入院时,两组患者的VAS疼痛强度基本相同,均符合中度和重度疼痛的评分标准,评分范围为4 ~ 7分,提示患者在前期或医疗后送过程中疼痛控制质量不高,镇痛效果较差。损伤后第14天,VAS疼痛强度基本对应于2分-轻度疼痛,表明疼痛控制稳定,疼痛治疗质量充分。然而,在第9天的观察中(p=0.009,然后<0.001),出现了差异,这很可能是由于患者受伤的解剖区域的数量。麻醉间隔时间逐渐增加。然而,从观察第10天开始,两组之间存在差异(p<0.001)。结论:所获得的数据表明,在战斗人员后送至军事医疗临床中心的军事流动医院治疗阶段以及后送过程中,应更加重视疼痛管理问题,因为治疗阶段之间缺乏高质量的疼痛控制是影响疼痛慢性发生频率的因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信