Analisis Struktur dan Kemunculan Tingkat Kognitif pada Desain Kegiatan Laboratorium Materi Fotosintesis

Nurwahidah wahidah, Bambang Supriatno, Mimin Nurjhani Kusumastuti
{"title":"Analisis Struktur dan Kemunculan Tingkat Kognitif pada Desain Kegiatan Laboratorium Materi Fotosintesis","authors":"Nurwahidah wahidah, Bambang Supriatno, Mimin Nurjhani Kusumastuti","doi":"10.17509/aijbe.v1i2.13050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In practical activities usually teachers provide guidance in the form of students’ worksheet or design of laboratory activity. Based on field studies Supriatno (2009), only 24% design laboratory that can be done with the appropriate procedures and complete results in terms of data analysis and conclusion, so it does not support the construction of knowledge. It required the analysis to determine whether design laboratory used already support the construction of knowledge. Design laboratory analysis refers to the Vee diagram and revised Bloom's taxonomy as both lead students to construct knowledge. This research is a descriptive study with purposive sampling technique. The research data captured with a rare test work results table, the table where the component diagram Vee, Vee diagrams scoring table, as well as the revised Bloom's taxonomy table. The results of the 16 samples and 5 samples design laboratory, junior high school design laboratory of photosynthetic material shows that there are still procedural mistakes and instruction unstructured. Vee diagram component analysis results show the general components that arises is the question of focus, the object/event, theories, principles, concepts and knowledge claims. Components that are generally not appear that notes/transformation. Results of the analysis showed scores of each component Vee diagram, Vee diagram on middle and high school degign laboratory generally have not yet reached the ideal score. Results of the analysis showed the emergence of the cognitive level of cognitive level generally required design laboratory in middle and high school, namely C1, C2 and C3, with dominant category procedural C3. This cognitive level is in conformity with the demands of basic competencies middle school, but not in accordance with the demands of basic competencies of high school.","PeriodicalId":228210,"journal":{"name":"Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v1i2.13050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

In practical activities usually teachers provide guidance in the form of students’ worksheet or design of laboratory activity. Based on field studies Supriatno (2009), only 24% design laboratory that can be done with the appropriate procedures and complete results in terms of data analysis and conclusion, so it does not support the construction of knowledge. It required the analysis to determine whether design laboratory used already support the construction of knowledge. Design laboratory analysis refers to the Vee diagram and revised Bloom's taxonomy as both lead students to construct knowledge. This research is a descriptive study with purposive sampling technique. The research data captured with a rare test work results table, the table where the component diagram Vee, Vee diagrams scoring table, as well as the revised Bloom's taxonomy table. The results of the 16 samples and 5 samples design laboratory, junior high school design laboratory of photosynthetic material shows that there are still procedural mistakes and instruction unstructured. Vee diagram component analysis results show the general components that arises is the question of focus, the object/event, theories, principles, concepts and knowledge claims. Components that are generally not appear that notes/transformation. Results of the analysis showed scores of each component Vee diagram, Vee diagram on middle and high school degign laboratory generally have not yet reached the ideal score. Results of the analysis showed the emergence of the cognitive level of cognitive level generally required design laboratory in middle and high school, namely C1, C2 and C3, with dominant category procedural C3. This cognitive level is in conformity with the demands of basic competencies middle school, but not in accordance with the demands of basic competencies of high school.
对光合作用材料设计的结构和认知水平的分析
在实践活动中,教师通常以学生作业表或设计实验活动的形式进行指导。根据实地研究Supriatno(2009),只有24%的设计实验室在数据分析和结论方面能够完成适当的程序和完整的结果,因此不支持知识的构建。这就要求分析确定设计实验室是否使用了已经支持建设的知识。设计实验室分析指的是v形图和修订后的Bloom分类法,它们都引导学生构建知识。本研究采用有目的抽样方法进行描述性研究。研究数据捕获了一个罕见的测试工作结果表,表中有组件图Vee,图Vee得分表,以及修订后的Bloom分类法表。16个样品和5个样品的设计实验室结果表明,初中光合材料设计实验室仍存在程序错误和指令不结构化。v图组件分析结果显示,一般组件所产生的问题是焦点、对象/事件、理论、原理、概念和知识主张。组件一般不会出现注释/转换。分析结果显示,初中和高中设计实验室的各组成部分的分数,Vee图普遍还没有达到理想的分数。分析结果表明,初高中设计实验室认知水平普遍要求出现认知水平,即C1、C2和C3,其中程序性C3占主导地位。这种认知水平符合初中基本能力的要求,但不符合高中基本能力的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信