Interest in Islam and Cross Religions

Muhammad Syauqi Bin Armia
{"title":"Interest in Islam and Cross Religions","authors":"Muhammad Syauqi Bin Armia","doi":"10.22373/PETITA.V4I1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Islamic principle encourages people to be alert for society. To achieve the objective of sharia, Muslim has been provided the clear path to collaborate with the creatures fairly.  The injustice financial practice one of the aspects that Islamic principles emphasise to not involve. On top of this, the usury (Riba) where someone charges the excess for the loan unfairly. \nThe interest practice has been a critical topic throughout the time. Due to the unfair practice, the major religions and civilisations cursed this practice as general. Nevertheless, in practical situations, there were numbers of approaches for each religion and civilisation. Plato with among ancient philosopher criticized this and argued this is a media to squeeze poor people. In Judaism, the interest is prohibited among Jews, while in the Hinduism allowed otherwise in a lower caste in the society. In Christianity, priests in the medieval banned this practice, but it has been diluted in the 6th century due to the sovereign pressure. Islam sprightly prohibited the interest despite the diversity of its models, the value, the grade and to whom it will be exercised.  \nThis article emphasises on Islamic finance point of view towards the cross religions and civilisation. Utilised the library/literature-based research, the author delivers the main ideas in the comparative approaches of the interest issues.","PeriodicalId":231408,"journal":{"name":"PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22373/PETITA.V4I1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Islamic principle encourages people to be alert for society. To achieve the objective of sharia, Muslim has been provided the clear path to collaborate with the creatures fairly.  The injustice financial practice one of the aspects that Islamic principles emphasise to not involve. On top of this, the usury (Riba) where someone charges the excess for the loan unfairly. The interest practice has been a critical topic throughout the time. Due to the unfair practice, the major religions and civilisations cursed this practice as general. Nevertheless, in practical situations, there were numbers of approaches for each religion and civilisation. Plato with among ancient philosopher criticized this and argued this is a media to squeeze poor people. In Judaism, the interest is prohibited among Jews, while in the Hinduism allowed otherwise in a lower caste in the society. In Christianity, priests in the medieval banned this practice, but it has been diluted in the 6th century due to the sovereign pressure. Islam sprightly prohibited the interest despite the diversity of its models, the value, the grade and to whom it will be exercised.  This article emphasises on Islamic finance point of view towards the cross religions and civilisation. Utilised the library/literature-based research, the author delivers the main ideas in the comparative approaches of the interest issues.
对伊斯兰教和跨宗教的兴趣
伊斯兰教的原则鼓励人们警惕社会。为了实现伊斯兰教法的目标,穆斯林被提供了一条与生物公平合作的清晰道路。不公正的金融实践是伊斯兰原则强调不涉及的方面之一。除此之外,高利贷(Riba)是指有人对贷款收取不公平的超额费用。兴趣实践一直是一个重要的话题。由于这种不公平的做法,各大宗教和文明都诅咒这种做法是普遍的。然而,在实际情况下,每种宗教和文明都有许多方法。柏拉图和其他古代哲学家对此进行了批判,认为这是一种压榨穷人的媒体。在犹太教中,犹太人之间的利益是被禁止的,而在印度教中,社会中较低种姓的人是允许的。在基督教中,中世纪的牧师禁止这种做法,但在6世纪,由于君主的压力,这种做法被淡化了。伊斯兰教明令禁止这种兴趣,尽管它的模式、价值、等级和对象各不相同。本文着重阐述了伊斯兰金融跨宗教、跨文明的观点。利用图书馆/文献为基础的研究,作者提出了利益问题的比较方法的主要思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信