Effecting Flow: The Relationship between the Perceived Team Climate for Innovations and the Experience of Flow and Worry

Laura Sophie Aichroth
{"title":"Effecting Flow: The Relationship between the Perceived Team Climate for Innovations and the Experience of Flow and Worry","authors":"Laura Sophie Aichroth","doi":"10.33422/3rd.icmrss.2020.11.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Over the past decades, the interest in research and practical recommendations on innovation climate at team and organizational level has grown. Furthermore, the positive effects of flow experience have become increasingly present at work. For the target group of members of product software development teams in Germany (N = 323), this study identified a significantly positive relation between the perceived team climate for innovations and the individual flow experience, whereas there is no significant relation between the perceived team climate for innovations and the individual experience of worry. Gender has no moderating effect. Regarding the four dimensions of the team climate for innovations, the expression of vision is relatively low for the target group of product software development teams in Germany compared to the norm tables. Participative safety is comparably high and task orientation and support for innovations are moderately distinctive. This means, all dimensions, except participative safety, need interventions in order to strengthen the team climate for innovations itself and thereby foster the flow experience. Since the extent of experiencing both flow and worry is relatively high, software product development itself and respectively the work environments seem to be stimulating, but also concerning for team members, which is why these aspects need action.","PeriodicalId":302956,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Modern Research in Social Sciences","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Modern Research in Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.icmrss.2020.11.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. Over the past decades, the interest in research and practical recommendations on innovation climate at team and organizational level has grown. Furthermore, the positive effects of flow experience have become increasingly present at work. For the target group of members of product software development teams in Germany (N = 323), this study identified a significantly positive relation between the perceived team climate for innovations and the individual flow experience, whereas there is no significant relation between the perceived team climate for innovations and the individual experience of worry. Gender has no moderating effect. Regarding the four dimensions of the team climate for innovations, the expression of vision is relatively low for the target group of product software development teams in Germany compared to the norm tables. Participative safety is comparably high and task orientation and support for innovations are moderately distinctive. This means, all dimensions, except participative safety, need interventions in order to strengthen the team climate for innovations itself and thereby foster the flow experience. Since the extent of experiencing both flow and worry is relatively high, software product development itself and respectively the work environments seem to be stimulating, but also concerning for team members, which is why these aspects need action.
影响心流:感知团队创新氛围与心流体验和忧虑的关系
. 在过去的几十年里,人们对团队和组织层面的创新氛围的研究和实际建议的兴趣越来越大。此外,心流体验的积极影响已经越来越多地出现在工作中。对于德国产品软件开发团队成员的目标群体(N = 323),本研究发现感知到的团队创新氛围与个人流程体验之间存在显著的正相关关系,而感知到的团队创新氛围与个人担忧体验之间没有显著的相关关系。性别没有调节作用。关于团队创新氛围的四个维度,与规范表相比,德国产品软件开发团队的目标群体的愿景表达相对较低。参与安全性较高,任务导向和创新支持具有中等差异。这意味着,除了参与性安全之外,所有维度都需要干预,以加强创新本身的团队氛围,从而促进流程体验。由于体验流程和担忧的程度相对较高,软件产品开发本身和各自的工作环境似乎是令人兴奋的,但也涉及团队成员,这就是为什么这些方面需要采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信