On the proactive identification of mistakes on concern mapping tasks

Camila Nunes
{"title":"On the proactive identification of mistakes on concern mapping tasks","authors":"Camila Nunes","doi":"10.1145/1960314.1960347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. RESEARCH PROBLEM AND MOTIVATION The activity of explicitly assigning a stakeholder’s concern to its corresponding elements in the source code is known as concern mapping (or concern assignment) [1]. This is one of the most recurring and common activities in software maintenance tasks. Even though many techniques (Section 3.1) partially support concern identification [2-5], the developers are always forced to exhaustively verify if the mappings are correct and complete. Otherwise, the developers can unwittingly miss or implement incorrect changes in the system modules. In addition, existing tools usually support concern identification only at the class and method level, which are not sufficient for many software change tasks.","PeriodicalId":353153,"journal":{"name":"Aspect-Oriented Software Development","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aspect-Oriented Software Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1960314.1960347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

1. RESEARCH PROBLEM AND MOTIVATION The activity of explicitly assigning a stakeholder’s concern to its corresponding elements in the source code is known as concern mapping (or concern assignment) [1]. This is one of the most recurring and common activities in software maintenance tasks. Even though many techniques (Section 3.1) partially support concern identification [2-5], the developers are always forced to exhaustively verify if the mappings are correct and complete. Otherwise, the developers can unwittingly miss or implement incorrect changes in the system modules. In addition, existing tools usually support concern identification only at the class and method level, which are not sufficient for many software change tasks.
论关系映射任务中错误的主动识别
1. 研究问题和动机明确地将涉众的关注点分配给源代码中相应的元素的活动被称为关注点映射(或关注点分配)[1]。这是软件维护任务中最常见的活动之一。即使许多技术(第3.1节)部分地支持关注点识别[2-5],开发人员总是被迫详尽地验证映射是否正确和完整。否则,开发人员可能会在不知不觉中错过或实现系统模块中不正确的更改。此外,现有的工具通常只支持类和方法级别的关注点识别,这对于许多软件变更任务来说是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信