REDUCING THE RISK OF WELL INTEGRITY INCIDENT BY INTEGRATING TOPSIS AND AHP MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING ANALYSIS

Ragil Sudira Wardana, M. Siallagan, R. Wardana
{"title":"REDUCING THE RISK OF WELL INTEGRITY INCIDENT BY INTEGRATING TOPSIS AND AHP MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING ANALYSIS","authors":"Ragil Sudira Wardana, M. Siallagan, R. Wardana","doi":"10.25105/PETRO.V10I1.8302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With current oil price downturn many oil wells become uneconomic. These uneconomic wells are left in an inactive state and become idle wells. Idle well is an environmental liability due to its risk of well integrity problems. Impacted by the downturn, the number of idle wells in the industry has been increasing in the industry. One of the solutions to mitigate these liabilities is by conducting plug & abandonment (P&A) on high-risk idle wellss. This research develops a combined framework of Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a risk assessment framework to prioritize high-risk idle wells for the P&A activity. In the assessment framework, surface condition, subsurface condition, and public exposure factors are taken as evaluation criteria to determine the risk level. The result of this research is 247 idle wells considered as high-risk wells and submitted as P&A candidates. The empirical result from this research can serve as a reference for oil companies in conducting a risk assessment on idle wells to design the proper activities to reduce environmental liabilities.","PeriodicalId":435945,"journal":{"name":"PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25105/PETRO.V10I1.8302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With current oil price downturn many oil wells become uneconomic. These uneconomic wells are left in an inactive state and become idle wells. Idle well is an environmental liability due to its risk of well integrity problems. Impacted by the downturn, the number of idle wells in the industry has been increasing in the industry. One of the solutions to mitigate these liabilities is by conducting plug & abandonment (P&A) on high-risk idle wellss. This research develops a combined framework of Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a risk assessment framework to prioritize high-risk idle wells for the P&A activity. In the assessment framework, surface condition, subsurface condition, and public exposure factors are taken as evaluation criteria to determine the risk level. The result of this research is 247 idle wells considered as high-risk wells and submitted as P&A candidates. The empirical result from this research can serve as a reference for oil companies in conducting a risk assessment on idle wells to design the proper activities to reduce environmental liabilities.
结合topsis和ahp多准则决策分析,降低井完整性事故风险
随着当前油价的下跌,许多油井变得不划算。这些不经济的井处于闲置状态,成为闲置井。由于井筒完整性问题的风险,闲置井是一种环境责任。受经济低迷的影响,该行业的闲置井数量一直在增加。缓解这些问题的解决方案之一是对高风险闲置井进行封井弃井(P&A)。本研究开发了一种结合了TOPSIS(理想解决方案相似性偏好排序技术)和AHP(层次分析法)作为风险评估框架的组合框架,以优先考虑高风险闲置井的弃井作业。在评价框架中,以地表状况、地下状况和公众暴露因素作为评价标准,确定风险等级。该研究的结果是247口闲置井被认为是高风险井,并作为弃井候选井提交。本研究的实证结果可为石油公司对闲置油井进行风险评估,设计适当的活动以减少环境责任提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信