Post crisis mega mergers and their effect on shareholders’ value

Loukia Evripidou
{"title":"Post crisis mega mergers and their effect on shareholders’ value","authors":"Loukia Evripidou","doi":"10.22495/CPR19A19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study examined the effect of post crisis mega mergers on shareholders’ value of the acquiring company. Twenty mergers have been evaluated covering all types of deals, vertical, horizontal as well as conglomerate mergers. The findings, in line with the relevant literature, indicate that the abnormal returns for the shareholders of the acquiring company are negative or neutral but in most case not statistically significant. Plausible explanation for the insignificance of the abnormal returns is the possibility of prior ownership of the purchased firm from the acquired one, or the differences in size between the two firms. In terms of the proposition that changes in the regulatory environment together with the more qualitative corporate governance generate value creation for shareholders after an M&A transaction, the result do not support this hypothesis. Having set that, the results do not suggests that the changes in corporate practice and regulatory framework in recent years do not have positive impact. Those benefits might come forth with a different long-term examination of the performance of the entity created. Finally this may suggests the existence of efficiency in the market denoting that prices do actually follow random walk and that new practices and regulations are incorporated in the price almost immediately without creating any room for excess return either positive or negative.","PeriodicalId":193680,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Search for the advanced practices","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Search for the advanced practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22495/CPR19A19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study examined the effect of post crisis mega mergers on shareholders’ value of the acquiring company. Twenty mergers have been evaluated covering all types of deals, vertical, horizontal as well as conglomerate mergers. The findings, in line with the relevant literature, indicate that the abnormal returns for the shareholders of the acquiring company are negative or neutral but in most case not statistically significant. Plausible explanation for the insignificance of the abnormal returns is the possibility of prior ownership of the purchased firm from the acquired one, or the differences in size between the two firms. In terms of the proposition that changes in the regulatory environment together with the more qualitative corporate governance generate value creation for shareholders after an M&A transaction, the result do not support this hypothesis. Having set that, the results do not suggests that the changes in corporate practice and regulatory framework in recent years do not have positive impact. Those benefits might come forth with a different long-term examination of the performance of the entity created. Finally this may suggests the existence of efficiency in the market denoting that prices do actually follow random walk and that new practices and regulations are incorporated in the price almost immediately without creating any room for excess return either positive or negative.
金融危机后的大型并购及其对股东价值的影响
本研究考察了危机后大型并购对收购公司股东价值的影响。已经评估了20个合并,涵盖了所有类型的交易,纵向,横向以及集团合并。研究结果与相关文献一致,表明收购公司股东的异常回报为负或中性,但在大多数情况下不具有统计学意义。对异常收益不显著的合理解释是,被收购企业可能在被收购企业之前拥有所有权,或者两家企业之间的规模差异。就并购交易后监管环境的变化以及公司治理的质量化程度的提高为股东创造价值的命题而言,研究结果并不支持这一假设。在设定了这一点之后,研究结果并不意味着近年来企业实践和监管框架的变化没有积极影响。这些好处可能会随着对所创建实体的表现进行不同的长期审查而显现出来。最后,这可能表明市场中存在效率,即价格实际上遵循随机游走,新的做法和规定几乎立即被纳入价格,而不会产生任何超额回报的空间,无论是正的还是负的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信