Usability evaluation of Electronic Health Records using user integrated Heuristic Walkthrough method

N. Wijesinghe, P. Prasad, A. Alsadoon, A. Elchouemi
{"title":"Usability evaluation of Electronic Health Records using user integrated Heuristic Walkthrough method","authors":"N. Wijesinghe, P. Prasad, A. Alsadoon, A. Elchouemi","doi":"10.1109/DT.2016.7557191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research paper aims to evaluate to what extent users such as medical professionals can collaborate with other evaluators in the usability evaluation of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The Heuristic Walkthrough (HW) method is a common technique in evaluating the usability of EHRs. It consists of two usability methods, Heuristic Evaluation (HE) and Cognitive Walkthrough (CW). After considering all participants, parameters, user interface elements and the usability characteristics in the evaluation process, issues have been identified in some areas of the HE and CW methods. As key findings, this study identifies lack of usability issues in EHRs negatively affecting user satisfaction with both techniques in the current HW method. The main aim of this report is to evaluate and extend the existing model and propose a new method termed `User Integrated HW' (UIHW) to eliminate the existing issues. Therefore, a Likert scale is implemented together with an open-ended questionnaire for both, HE and CW methods, to enhance the user integration as well as to obtain user reviews about the subject matter to support usability expertise.","PeriodicalId":281446,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DT.2016.7557191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This research paper aims to evaluate to what extent users such as medical professionals can collaborate with other evaluators in the usability evaluation of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The Heuristic Walkthrough (HW) method is a common technique in evaluating the usability of EHRs. It consists of two usability methods, Heuristic Evaluation (HE) and Cognitive Walkthrough (CW). After considering all participants, parameters, user interface elements and the usability characteristics in the evaluation process, issues have been identified in some areas of the HE and CW methods. As key findings, this study identifies lack of usability issues in EHRs negatively affecting user satisfaction with both techniques in the current HW method. The main aim of this report is to evaluate and extend the existing model and propose a new method termed `User Integrated HW' (UIHW) to eliminate the existing issues. Therefore, a Likert scale is implemented together with an open-ended questionnaire for both, HE and CW methods, to enhance the user integration as well as to obtain user reviews about the subject matter to support usability expertise.
基于用户集成启发式演练方法的电子健康记录可用性评估
本研究旨在评估医疗专业人员等使用者在电子健康档案(Electronic Health Records, EHRs)可用性评估中与其他评估者合作的程度。启发式演练(HW)方法是评估电子病历可用性的常用技术。它包括两种可用性方法:启发式评估(HE)和认知演练(CW)。在考虑了评估过程中的所有参与者、参数、用户界面元素和可用性特征后,发现了HE和CW方法在某些领域存在的问题。作为主要发现,本研究确定了电子病历中缺乏可用性问题,对当前HW方法中两种技术的用户满意度产生了负面影响。本报告的主要目的是评估和扩展现有模型,并提出一种称为“用户集成HW”(UIHW)的新方法来消除现有问题。因此,李克特量表与开放式问卷(HE和CW方法)一起实现,以增强用户集成,并获得关于主题的用户评论,以支持可用性专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信