Simulating Turbulent Air Flow Past a Hemispherical Body

M. Meas, J. Bruwer, M. Combrinck, T. M. Harms
{"title":"Simulating Turbulent Air Flow Past a Hemispherical Body","authors":"M. Meas, J. Bruwer, M. Combrinck, T. M. Harms","doi":"10.17159/2309-8988/2021/v37a10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The flow of air past a smooth surface-mounted hemisphere is investigated numerically using six common RANS turbulence models and seeking steady flow solutions. Where possible, the turbulence models are applied using standard wall functions, resolving the viscous sublayer, and the enhanced wall treatment option in ANSYS Fluent. Results of the simulations are compared against measurements taken in a wind tunnel experiment. The comparison shows that enhanced wall treatment and resolving the boundary layer on a low Reynolds number mesh yields superior accuracy compared to standard wall functions or resolving the boundary layer on a high Reynolds number mesh, for all the turbulence models considered. The RNG k - ε model with enhanced wall treatment applied is found to yield the most accurate prediction of the static pressure distribution across the surface of the hemisphere model. Conversely, the Reynolds Stress model and the standard k - ω model are found to give the least accurate predictions, irrespective of the near-wall modelling approach applied. It is found that good agreement with the experimental data for this case offlows can be attained using each of the near-wall modelling techniques if a well-suited turbulence model is used. Keywords: hemisphere, wind tunnel, turbulence modelling, computational fluid dynamics, steady flow","PeriodicalId":299970,"journal":{"name":"R&D Journal","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"R&D Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8988/2021/v37a10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The flow of air past a smooth surface-mounted hemisphere is investigated numerically using six common RANS turbulence models and seeking steady flow solutions. Where possible, the turbulence models are applied using standard wall functions, resolving the viscous sublayer, and the enhanced wall treatment option in ANSYS Fluent. Results of the simulations are compared against measurements taken in a wind tunnel experiment. The comparison shows that enhanced wall treatment and resolving the boundary layer on a low Reynolds number mesh yields superior accuracy compared to standard wall functions or resolving the boundary layer on a high Reynolds number mesh, for all the turbulence models considered. The RNG k - ε model with enhanced wall treatment applied is found to yield the most accurate prediction of the static pressure distribution across the surface of the hemisphere model. Conversely, the Reynolds Stress model and the standard k - ω model are found to give the least accurate predictions, irrespective of the near-wall modelling approach applied. It is found that good agreement with the experimental data for this case offlows can be attained using each of the near-wall modelling techniques if a well-suited turbulence model is used. Keywords: hemisphere, wind tunnel, turbulence modelling, computational fluid dynamics, steady flow
模拟湍流气流经过一个半球形物体
摘要采用六种常见的RANS湍流模型,对空气在光滑表面安装的半球上的流动进行了数值研究,并寻求了稳定流动的解。在可能的情况下,使用标准壁函数应用湍流模型,解决粘性子层和ANSYS Fluent中的增强壁处理选项。将模拟结果与风洞实验结果进行了比较。对比表明,对于所有考虑的湍流模型,强化壁面处理和在低雷诺数网格上解析边界层比标准壁面函数或在高雷诺数网格上解析边界层具有更高的精度。采用强化壁面处理的RNG k - ε模型可以最准确地预测半球模型表面的静压分布。相反,无论采用何种近壁建模方法,都发现雷诺应力模型和标准k - ω模型给出的预测精度最低。研究发现,如果使用合适的湍流模型,则可以使用每种近壁模拟技术获得与这种情况下流动的实验数据良好的一致性。关键词:半球,风洞,湍流建模,计算流体力学,定常流动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信