The Rise of Scientific Curriculum Making and Its Aftermath

H. Kliebard
{"title":"The Rise of Scientific Curriculum Making and Its Aftermath","authors":"H. Kliebard","doi":"10.1080/00784931.1975.11075792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"chapter, \"Curriculum Construction and Consensus of Opinion\" and of W. W. Charters in the succeeding chapter, \"Curriculum Making and the Method of Job Analysis,\" Bode was attacking not only the work of two men who had established themselves as the prototypes of the curriculum specialist, but the very foundations on which curriculum as a field of specialization had been based. Bode probably did not suspect, however, that the notion of careful prespecification of educational objectives (with variations in terminology and technique) and the notion of activity analysis as the means toward their \"discovery\" (also with variations in terminology and technique) would become the foundations on which, almost half a century later, many books would be written, Ph.D.s awarded, careers established, and millions of dollars expended. Certainly Bode never dreamed that legislation embodying these principles would be enacted across the United States and that the very ideas he was attacking would become semi-official doctrine in federal and state agencies as well as in many educational institutions.","PeriodicalId":273582,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Theory Network","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"80","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Theory Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00784931.1975.11075792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

Abstract

chapter, "Curriculum Construction and Consensus of Opinion" and of W. W. Charters in the succeeding chapter, "Curriculum Making and the Method of Job Analysis," Bode was attacking not only the work of two men who had established themselves as the prototypes of the curriculum specialist, but the very foundations on which curriculum as a field of specialization had been based. Bode probably did not suspect, however, that the notion of careful prespecification of educational objectives (with variations in terminology and technique) and the notion of activity analysis as the means toward their "discovery" (also with variations in terminology and technique) would become the foundations on which, almost half a century later, many books would be written, Ph.D.s awarded, careers established, and millions of dollars expended. Certainly Bode never dreamed that legislation embodying these principles would be enacted across the United States and that the very ideas he was attacking would become semi-official doctrine in federal and state agencies as well as in many educational institutions.
科学课程制定的兴起及其后果
在《课程构建与意见共识》一章和《课程制定与工作分析方法》一章中,博德不仅攻击了两位已确立自己为课程专家原型的人的工作,而且攻击了课程作为一个专业领域所依据的基础。然而,博德可能没有想到,仔细地预先说明教育目标的概念(使用不同的术语和技术)和作为“发现”手段的活动分析的概念(也使用不同的术语和技术)将成为近半个世纪后,许多书被写出来、博士学位被授予、职业生涯确立和数百万美元的支出的基础。当然,博德做梦也没有想到,体现这些原则的立法会在美国各地颁布,他所抨击的思想会成为联邦和州机构以及许多教育机构的半官方教义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信