Analysis of consumers' negative perceptions of health tracking in insurance - a value sacrifice approach

Antti Talonen, Jukka Mähönen, L. Koskinen, Päivikki Kuoppakangas
{"title":"Analysis of consumers' negative perceptions of health tracking in insurance - a value sacrifice approach","authors":"Antti Talonen, Jukka Mähönen, L. Koskinen, Päivikki Kuoppakangas","doi":"10.1108/jices-05-2020-0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper explores and identifies customer-value-related sacrifices that consumers attach to interactive health/life insurance. This paper aims to increase understanding of why individual consumers are not willing to embrace behaviour-tracking-based insurance applications.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors analysed data from a qualitative survey of Finnish insurance consumers who were not keen on adopting interactive insurance products.\n\n\nFindings\nDeveloped through thematic analysis, the framework presented in this paper illustrates consumers’ value sacrifices on four dimensions: economic, functional, emotional and symbolic value.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe framework and insights emerging in the study hold several implications related to increased understanding of consumers’ perceptions of insurance and to developing interactive insurance services. In addition, this work provides a promising foundation and avenues for further considerations related to digital ethics in insurance.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first piece applying a value sacrifice perspective in studying consumers’ unwillingness to adopt interactive insurance products.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-05-2020-0061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This paper explores and identifies customer-value-related sacrifices that consumers attach to interactive health/life insurance. This paper aims to increase understanding of why individual consumers are not willing to embrace behaviour-tracking-based insurance applications. Design/methodology/approach The authors analysed data from a qualitative survey of Finnish insurance consumers who were not keen on adopting interactive insurance products. Findings Developed through thematic analysis, the framework presented in this paper illustrates consumers’ value sacrifices on four dimensions: economic, functional, emotional and symbolic value. Research limitations/implications The framework and insights emerging in the study hold several implications related to increased understanding of consumers’ perceptions of insurance and to developing interactive insurance services. In addition, this work provides a promising foundation and avenues for further considerations related to digital ethics in insurance. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first piece applying a value sacrifice perspective in studying consumers’ unwillingness to adopt interactive insurance products.
消费者对保险中健康追踪的负面看法分析——一种价值牺牲方法
目的本文探讨并确定消费者对交互式健康/人寿保险的客户价值相关牺牲。本文旨在加深理解为什么个人消费者不愿意接受基于行为跟踪的保险应用程序。设计/方法/方法作者分析了芬兰保险消费者的定性调查数据,这些消费者不热衷于采用互动式保险产品。通过主题分析,本文提出的框架从四个维度阐述了消费者的价值牺牲:经济、功能、情感和象征价值。研究局限/启示研究中出现的框架和见解与加深了解消费者对保险的看法和发展互动式保险服务有关。此外,这项工作为进一步考虑与保险中的数字伦理有关的问题提供了有希望的基础和途径。原创性/价值就作者所知,本文是第一个运用价值牺牲的视角来研究消费者不愿意采用互动式保险产品的文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信