Financial Crisis Prediction Capability of Financial Ratios

M. Islam
{"title":"Financial Crisis Prediction Capability of Financial Ratios","authors":"M. Islam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3622574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bankruptcy of a business firm is an event which results substantial losses to creditors and stockholders. A model which is capable of predicting an upcoming business failure will serve as a very useful tool to reduce such losses by providing warning to the interested parties. This was the main motivation for Beaver (1966) and Altman (1968) to construct bankruptcy prediction models based on the financial data (Deakin 1972).\u2028This research study also initiated with a great interest on this subject to investigate the predictive capability of financial ratios for forecasting of corporate distress and bankruptcy events. <br><br>The current global financial climate demands even the best international companies to constantly monitor their financial situation and their related companies with which they cooperate. Globalization process has delivered a complex network of relationships in the business environment. Due to increase in complexity of related business environment, forecasting the financial health of companies nowadays became increasingly important and worthwhile to analyse (Korol 2013). Bankruptcy is a continuous process, which can be distinguished into several stages, starting from the emergence of the first signs of financial crisis, through blindness and ignorance towards the financial and nonfinancial symptoms of crisis in a firm, to inappropriate activities that lead to the final phase of the crisis, which is bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy process cycle may take up to 5–6 years which is not a sudden phenomenon and impossible to predict, however the earlier warning signals can be detected and corrective measures may avoid the ultimate bankruptcy event depending on the preparation and reactions of the management to tackle the bankruptcy (Korol 2013). Due to the recent worldwide corporate financial crisis the need to reform the existing financial architecture has been intensified. Objective of business crisis prediction is to build models that can read the risk factors from the past observations and evaluate business crisis risk of companies with a much broader scope (Lin et al. 2011). <br><br>Ozkan cited in Lin et al. 2011 mentioned that financial indicators has been reviewed by number of researchers as a major basis for predicting financial distress and some common methodologies including peer group analysis, comprehensive risk assessment systems, and statistical and econometric analysis. Premachandra (2009) argued that bankruptcy prediction is important because corporate failure imposes significant direct and indirect costs on stakeholders. Warner cited in Premachandra (2009), evidence suggests that direct bankruptcy costs (such as court costs, lawyers and accountants fees) may be as low as 5%, or (Altman cited in Premachandra 2009) can shoot up to 28% when both direct and indirect costs (such as lost sales, lost profits, higher cost of credit, inability to issue new securities and lost investment opportunities) are considered. Therefore the early detection of potential bankruptcy is very important due to corporate decision makers make their decisions in a world of dynamic technology development, imperfect knowledge and uncertainty (Premachandra 2009). <br><br>Niewrzedowski cited in Korol (2013) indicated that as per statistical analysis by Huler-Hermes, the number of potential bankruptcy has been increased in USA by 54%, in Spain by 118% and in the UK by 56%. Therefore the importance of early warning of potential bankruptcy has been increased along with the overall increase of bankruptcy risk in companies around the world. <br>","PeriodicalId":192282,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Institutional Financial Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Institutional Financial Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3622574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bankruptcy of a business firm is an event which results substantial losses to creditors and stockholders. A model which is capable of predicting an upcoming business failure will serve as a very useful tool to reduce such losses by providing warning to the interested parties. This was the main motivation for Beaver (1966) and Altman (1968) to construct bankruptcy prediction models based on the financial data (Deakin 1972).
This research study also initiated with a great interest on this subject to investigate the predictive capability of financial ratios for forecasting of corporate distress and bankruptcy events.

The current global financial climate demands even the best international companies to constantly monitor their financial situation and their related companies with which they cooperate. Globalization process has delivered a complex network of relationships in the business environment. Due to increase in complexity of related business environment, forecasting the financial health of companies nowadays became increasingly important and worthwhile to analyse (Korol 2013). Bankruptcy is a continuous process, which can be distinguished into several stages, starting from the emergence of the first signs of financial crisis, through blindness and ignorance towards the financial and nonfinancial symptoms of crisis in a firm, to inappropriate activities that lead to the final phase of the crisis, which is bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy process cycle may take up to 5–6 years which is not a sudden phenomenon and impossible to predict, however the earlier warning signals can be detected and corrective measures may avoid the ultimate bankruptcy event depending on the preparation and reactions of the management to tackle the bankruptcy (Korol 2013). Due to the recent worldwide corporate financial crisis the need to reform the existing financial architecture has been intensified. Objective of business crisis prediction is to build models that can read the risk factors from the past observations and evaluate business crisis risk of companies with a much broader scope (Lin et al. 2011).

Ozkan cited in Lin et al. 2011 mentioned that financial indicators has been reviewed by number of researchers as a major basis for predicting financial distress and some common methodologies including peer group analysis, comprehensive risk assessment systems, and statistical and econometric analysis. Premachandra (2009) argued that bankruptcy prediction is important because corporate failure imposes significant direct and indirect costs on stakeholders. Warner cited in Premachandra (2009), evidence suggests that direct bankruptcy costs (such as court costs, lawyers and accountants fees) may be as low as 5%, or (Altman cited in Premachandra 2009) can shoot up to 28% when both direct and indirect costs (such as lost sales, lost profits, higher cost of credit, inability to issue new securities and lost investment opportunities) are considered. Therefore the early detection of potential bankruptcy is very important due to corporate decision makers make their decisions in a world of dynamic technology development, imperfect knowledge and uncertainty (Premachandra 2009).

Niewrzedowski cited in Korol (2013) indicated that as per statistical analysis by Huler-Hermes, the number of potential bankruptcy has been increased in USA by 54%, in Spain by 118% and in the UK by 56%. Therefore the importance of early warning of potential bankruptcy has been increased along with the overall increase of bankruptcy risk in companies around the world.
财务比率对金融危机的预测能力
企业破产是指给债权人和股东造成重大损失的事件。一个能够预测即将到来的业务失败的模型将作为一个非常有用的工具,通过向相关方提供警告来减少这种损失。这是Beaver(1966)和Altman(1968)基于财务数据构建破产预测模型(Deakin 1972)的主要动机。
本研究也是怀着浓厚的兴趣开始研究财务比率对企业困境和破产事件的预测能力。当前的全球金融环境要求即使是最好的国际公司也要不断监测自己的财务状况以及与之合作的相关公司。全球化进程在商业环境中产生了复杂的关系网络。由于相关商业环境的复杂性增加,预测公司的财务健康状况如今变得越来越重要,值得分析(Korol 2013)。破产是一个连续的过程,它可以分为几个阶段,从财务危机的最初迹象出现开始,通过对企业危机的财务和非财务症状的盲目和无知,到导致危机的最后阶段,即破产的不适当活动。破产过程周期可能需要5-6年,这不是一个突然的现象,也不可能预测,但是可以检测到早期的预警信号,并采取纠正措施,这取决于管理层处理破产的准备和反应,可能会避免最终的破产事件(Korol 2013)。由于最近的全球企业金融危机,改革现有金融架构的必要性已经加剧。企业危机预测的目的是建立可以从过去的观察中读取风险因素的模型,并在更广泛的范围内评估公司的商业危机风险(Lin et al. 2011)。Ozkan在Lin et al. 2011中提到,许多研究人员已经将财务指标作为预测财务困境的主要依据,以及一些常见的方法,包括同行群体分析、综合风险评估系统、统计和计量经济学分析。Premachandra(2009)认为破产预测很重要,因为企业倒闭会给利益相关者带来巨大的直接和间接成本。在Premachandra(2009)中引用的Warner,证据表明,直接破产成本(如法庭费用,律师和会计师费用)可能低至5%,或者(Altman在Premachandra 2009中引用),如果考虑到直接和间接成本(如销售损失,利润损失,更高的信贷成本,无法发行新证券和失去的投资机会),可以飙升至28%。因此,早期发现潜在的破产是非常重要的,因为企业决策者是在一个动态的技术发展、不完善的知识和不确定性的世界里做出决策的(Premachandra 2009)。Korol(2013)引用Niewrzedowski指出,根据hler - hermes的统计分析,美国的潜在破产人数增加了54%,西班牙增加了118%,英国增加了56%。因此,随着全球范围内企业破产风险的整体增加,潜在破产预警的重要性也随之增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信