Under the Banner of Nationalism: The Changing Imagery of Anticolonial Leadership

{"title":"Under the Banner of Nationalism: The Changing Imagery of Anticolonial Leadership","authors":"","doi":"10.1525/luminos.51.b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liberation from Japanese colonial rule in 1945 galvanized on an unprecedented scale a new fervor for a uniquely national culture in Korea. In the social euphoria of liberation, intellectuals and cultural critics advocated the need to overcome Japanese domination in the broadest sense. Yet the effort to forge a new national culture soon faced a complex set of challenges deriving from the political confusion of the time and factional rivalries, as well as the pressure of the new occupying force. The US Army Military Government in Korea (USAMGIK) that replaced the former colonial regime introduced new measures of control and regulation over cultural activities to block the spread of leftist ideologies subversive to its political objectives in Korea.1 Often, USAMGIK reemployed the agents and mechanisms of the former colonial regime to oversee social activity and cultural production in Korea, provoking the ire and discontent of Koreans. Film production, distribution, and exhibition, in particular, faced stringent constraints from the neocolonial authority.2 Film production, which had been hampered by the vicissitudes of Japanese wartime mobilization, was in need of the material and institutional support of the occupation force.3 Concurrently, the new authority imposed strict censorship over film content to inhibit anything deemed subversive to its domination in Korea.4 In fact, the lack of resources for commercial filmmaking, such as shortages of production funds, raw film stock, production equipment, and postproduction facilities, delayed the resumption of full film production in the immediate liberation period.5 Film distribution and exhibition sectors also faced challenges of their own under the control of USAMGIK. The formative years of liberation under the US occupation (from 1945 to 1948) hence were marked by new tensions. How to narrate the colonial experience 1","PeriodicalId":265212,"journal":{"name":"Parameters of Disavowal: Colonial Representation in South Korean Cinema","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parameters of Disavowal: Colonial Representation in South Korean Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.51.b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liberation from Japanese colonial rule in 1945 galvanized on an unprecedented scale a new fervor for a uniquely national culture in Korea. In the social euphoria of liberation, intellectuals and cultural critics advocated the need to overcome Japanese domination in the broadest sense. Yet the effort to forge a new national culture soon faced a complex set of challenges deriving from the political confusion of the time and factional rivalries, as well as the pressure of the new occupying force. The US Army Military Government in Korea (USAMGIK) that replaced the former colonial regime introduced new measures of control and regulation over cultural activities to block the spread of leftist ideologies subversive to its political objectives in Korea.1 Often, USAMGIK reemployed the agents and mechanisms of the former colonial regime to oversee social activity and cultural production in Korea, provoking the ire and discontent of Koreans. Film production, distribution, and exhibition, in particular, faced stringent constraints from the neocolonial authority.2 Film production, which had been hampered by the vicissitudes of Japanese wartime mobilization, was in need of the material and institutional support of the occupation force.3 Concurrently, the new authority imposed strict censorship over film content to inhibit anything deemed subversive to its domination in Korea.4 In fact, the lack of resources for commercial filmmaking, such as shortages of production funds, raw film stock, production equipment, and postproduction facilities, delayed the resumption of full film production in the immediate liberation period.5 Film distribution and exhibition sectors also faced challenges of their own under the control of USAMGIK. The formative years of liberation under the US occupation (from 1945 to 1948) hence were marked by new tensions. How to narrate the colonial experience 1
民族主义旗帜下:反殖民领导形象的变化
1945年光复后,对独特民族文化的热情空前高涨。在解放的社会欢愉中,知识分子和文化评论家主张需要在最广泛的意义上克服日本的统治。然而,建立一个新的民族文化的努力很快就面临着一系列复杂的挑战,这些挑战来自于当时的政治混乱和派系对抗,以及新的占领军的压力。取代前殖民政权的驻韩美军军事政府(USAMGIK)对文化活动采取了新的控制和监管措施,以阻止颠覆其政治目标的左派意识形态在韩国的传播。1 USAMGIK经常重新雇用前殖民政权的代理人和机制来监督韩国的社会活动和文化生产,引发韩国人的愤怒和不满。特别是电影的制作、发行和放映,面临着新殖民主义当局的严格限制由于日本战时动员的变迁,电影制作受到了阻碍,需要占领军在物质和制度上的支持同时,新当局对电影内容实行严格的审查,以禁止任何被视为颠覆其在韩国统治地位的东西。事实上,商业电影制作资源的缺乏,如制作资金、原始电影库存、制作设备和后期制作设施的短缺,推迟了在刚解放时期全面恢复电影制作在驻韩美军的控制下,电影发行和放映部门也面临着各自的挑战。因此,在美国占领下的解放形成时期(1945年至1948年),出现了新的紧张局势。如何叙述殖民时期的经历
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信