Umbilical artery blood flow in intra-uterine growth retarded fetuses and fetal outcome: a study of 102 cases.

C Anandakumar, C S Lee, Y C Wong, D Chia, S Arulkumaran, S S Ratnam
{"title":"Umbilical artery blood flow in intra-uterine growth retarded fetuses and fetal outcome: a study of 102 cases.","authors":"C Anandakumar,&nbsp;C S Lee,&nbsp;Y C Wong,&nbsp;D Chia,&nbsp;S Arulkumaran,&nbsp;S S Ratnam","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 102 fetuses diagnosed by ultrasound to be asymmetrically growth-retarded had blood flow velocity waveforms of the umbilical artery studied. Sixty-two cases had normal blood flow, 28 had abnormal blood flow but with present end-diastolic flow, 8 had absent end-diastolic flow, and 4 had reversal of end-diastolic flow. Comparison was made between the blood flow status and other biophysical methods of antenatal surveillance and perinatal outcome. There is a strong correlation between abnormal blood flow and abnormalities detected by other biophysical methods of antenatal surveillance. Our study shows that fetuses with severe blood flow impairment tend to be more severely growth-retarded and to be delivered earlier. Our results also show abnormal blood flow to be associated with a poor perinatal outcome. Those fetuses with severe impairment of blood flow suffered a high incidence of operative delivery for fetal distress, acidosis at birth, perinatal mortality and morbidity. The association between abnormal blood flow and the 5-minute Apgar score is significant only in those with the severest impairment of blood flow. Our results are in close agreement with similar studies recorded in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":8557,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Oceania journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"18 3","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Oceania journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 102 fetuses diagnosed by ultrasound to be asymmetrically growth-retarded had blood flow velocity waveforms of the umbilical artery studied. Sixty-two cases had normal blood flow, 28 had abnormal blood flow but with present end-diastolic flow, 8 had absent end-diastolic flow, and 4 had reversal of end-diastolic flow. Comparison was made between the blood flow status and other biophysical methods of antenatal surveillance and perinatal outcome. There is a strong correlation between abnormal blood flow and abnormalities detected by other biophysical methods of antenatal surveillance. Our study shows that fetuses with severe blood flow impairment tend to be more severely growth-retarded and to be delivered earlier. Our results also show abnormal blood flow to be associated with a poor perinatal outcome. Those fetuses with severe impairment of blood flow suffered a high incidence of operative delivery for fetal distress, acidosis at birth, perinatal mortality and morbidity. The association between abnormal blood flow and the 5-minute Apgar score is significant only in those with the severest impairment of blood flow. Our results are in close agreement with similar studies recorded in the literature.

102例宫内发育迟缓胎儿脐动脉血流与胎儿结局的研究。
对102例超声诊断为不对称生长迟缓的胎儿进行了脐动脉血流速度波形的研究。血流正常62例,有舒张末期血流异常28例,无舒张末期血流8例,舒张末期血流逆转4例。对血流量状况和其他产前监测生物物理方法与围产儿结局进行比较。异常血流与产前监测的其他生物物理方法检测到的异常之间存在很强的相关性。我们的研究表明,有严重血流障碍的胎儿往往会出现更严重的生长迟缓和更早的分娩。我们的结果也显示异常血流与不良围产期结局有关。那些有严重血流障碍的胎儿因胎儿窘迫、出生时酸中毒、围产期死亡率和发病率而手术分娩的发生率很高。血流量异常与5分钟Apgar评分之间的关联仅在血流量受损最严重的患者中才有意义。我们的结果与文献中记录的类似研究非常一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信