Successfully Navigating the Narrow Pressure Window in an HPHT Offshore Well

L. Devadass, Sasha Syrapushchynski, Jené Rockwood
{"title":"Successfully Navigating the Narrow Pressure Window in an HPHT Offshore Well","authors":"L. Devadass, Sasha Syrapushchynski, Jené Rockwood","doi":"10.2118/198407-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While the main objective for Well #1 was to appraise the hydrocarbon potential at depths below a known gas reservoir, the operator was able to drill a high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) reservoir section with a mud density of 18.4-lb/gal (2.2 sg) with zero fluid losses. The highly deviated appraised interval had both very low and extremely high pore pressures, with the maximum overbalance of approximately 6,800 psi(46,900 kPa).\n Compared to offset appraisal wells, downhole losses, hole instability, differentially stuck pipe and well control issues were avoided through the adoption of a low-invasion synthetic fluid system designed with wellbore shielding technology. During the planning phase, the operator conducted extensive laboratory testing to assure technical performance, as well as cost reductions, were achieved by optimizing the drilling fluid design. Best practices from previous HPHT wells were carefully studied and replicated to ensure the success of the well.\n Wellbore stability was achieved and the 8½-in. hole section was drilled into the targeted formation tops. In the reservoir hole section, the mud weight was increased to 18.4-lb/gal (2.2 sg) in order to compensate for high pore pressures up to 14,000 psi (96,500 kPa); the highest overbalanced pressure measured was 6,800 psi (46,900 kPa) due to the low pore pressure in the sands above. The drilling fluid was designed with wellbore shielding technology to create an impermeable barrier across low-pressure zones and minimize pressure transmission from high mud density. The rheological properties of the drilling fluid were monitored along with maintaining a thin filter cake and low solids content.\n Operational issues and challenges to drilling exploration wells in HPHT environments with high differential pressures continue to be an ongoing industry concern. The drilling fluid design used in this well shows great potential to eliminate drilling hazards in tough downhole conditions.","PeriodicalId":406524,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Fri, October 18, 2019","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Fri, October 18, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198407-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the main objective for Well #1 was to appraise the hydrocarbon potential at depths below a known gas reservoir, the operator was able to drill a high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) reservoir section with a mud density of 18.4-lb/gal (2.2 sg) with zero fluid losses. The highly deviated appraised interval had both very low and extremely high pore pressures, with the maximum overbalance of approximately 6,800 psi(46,900 kPa). Compared to offset appraisal wells, downhole losses, hole instability, differentially stuck pipe and well control issues were avoided through the adoption of a low-invasion synthetic fluid system designed with wellbore shielding technology. During the planning phase, the operator conducted extensive laboratory testing to assure technical performance, as well as cost reductions, were achieved by optimizing the drilling fluid design. Best practices from previous HPHT wells were carefully studied and replicated to ensure the success of the well. Wellbore stability was achieved and the 8½-in. hole section was drilled into the targeted formation tops. In the reservoir hole section, the mud weight was increased to 18.4-lb/gal (2.2 sg) in order to compensate for high pore pressures up to 14,000 psi (96,500 kPa); the highest overbalanced pressure measured was 6,800 psi (46,900 kPa) due to the low pore pressure in the sands above. The drilling fluid was designed with wellbore shielding technology to create an impermeable barrier across low-pressure zones and minimize pressure transmission from high mud density. The rheological properties of the drilling fluid were monitored along with maintaining a thin filter cake and low solids content. Operational issues and challenges to drilling exploration wells in HPHT environments with high differential pressures continue to be an ongoing industry concern. The drilling fluid design used in this well shows great potential to eliminate drilling hazards in tough downhole conditions.
成功利用高压高压海上井的窄压力窗口
虽然1号井的主要目的是评估已知气藏以下深度的油气潜力,但作业者能够钻进高压高温(HPHT)油藏段,泥浆密度为18.4 lb/gal (2.2 sg),流体损失为零。大斜度评价层段孔隙压力既低又高,最大过平衡约为6800 psi(46900 kPa)。与邻井评价井相比,通过采用具有井眼保护技术的低侵入合成流体系统,避免了井下漏失、井眼不稳定、差异卡钻和井控问题。在计划阶段,作业者进行了大量的实验室测试,以确保通过优化钻井液设计实现技术性能和成本降低。为了确保该井的成功,我们仔细研究和复制了以前高温高压井的最佳实践。实现了井筒稳定性,8 - 1 / 2 -in井眼井段钻进目标地层顶部。在储层井段,泥浆比重增加到18.4 lb/gal (2.2 sg),以补偿高达14000 psi (96500 kPa)的高孔隙压力;由于砂层孔隙压力较低,测得的最高过平衡压力为6800 psi (46900 kPa)。该钻井液采用了井筒屏蔽技术,在低压区形成不渗透屏障,最大限度地减少高泥浆密度带来的压力传递。监测钻井液的流变特性,同时保持薄滤饼和低固体含量。在高压高压环境下钻探井的操作问题和挑战一直是业界关注的问题。在这口井中使用的钻井液设计显示出在恶劣的井下条件下消除钻井危险的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信