Comparison and validation studies related to the modeling ionospheric convection and the European incoherent scatter observations in the polar cap

R. Lukianova, A. Kozlovsky, T. Turunen
{"title":"Comparison and validation studies related to the modeling ionospheric convection and the European incoherent scatter observations in the polar cap","authors":"R. Lukianova, A. Kozlovsky, T. Turunen","doi":"10.1029/2007GI000169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[1] We use the ionospheric velocity measurements obtained by the European incoherent scatter (EISCAT) Svalbard radar (ESR) for comparison with the electric field distribution predicted by the new ionospheric convection model based on realistic maps of field-aligned currents. The comparative analysis of model output and observations is based on the data contained both the north–south and east–west components of the ionospheric electric field. Such a comparison provides an independent check of the model. It is shown that the model represents accurately the large-scale features of statistical electric field inferred from the ion velocity measured by the ESR. From observations and modeling we quantitatively determine the dependence of the ionospheric electric field strength on the IMF conditions and how this varies with magnetic local time. For specification of the relationship we derive average convection patterns for sorting by the magnitude and direction of the IMF. The dependence is clearly seen by contrasting the results for two magnitudes of the IMF strength (BT = 1 and 5 nT), for two opposite directions of the IMF Bz component, and for By+, By−. The magnitude of the IMF has the main impact on the average flows under southward IMF conditions. The sign of IMF By is the most important factor influenced the convection system under the IMF northward. For By− the northward component is negative during a major part of the day indicating counterclockwise plasma flow around the pole. For By+, the situation is opposite, the electric field is directed poleward and the plasma rotate clockwise. These are confirmed nicely by the ESR observations.","PeriodicalId":135868,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GI000169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

[1] We use the ionospheric velocity measurements obtained by the European incoherent scatter (EISCAT) Svalbard radar (ESR) for comparison with the electric field distribution predicted by the new ionospheric convection model based on realistic maps of field-aligned currents. The comparative analysis of model output and observations is based on the data contained both the north–south and east–west components of the ionospheric electric field. Such a comparison provides an independent check of the model. It is shown that the model represents accurately the large-scale features of statistical electric field inferred from the ion velocity measured by the ESR. From observations and modeling we quantitatively determine the dependence of the ionospheric electric field strength on the IMF conditions and how this varies with magnetic local time. For specification of the relationship we derive average convection patterns for sorting by the magnitude and direction of the IMF. The dependence is clearly seen by contrasting the results for two magnitudes of the IMF strength (BT = 1 and 5 nT), for two opposite directions of the IMF Bz component, and for By+, By−. The magnitude of the IMF has the main impact on the average flows under southward IMF conditions. The sign of IMF By is the most important factor influenced the convection system under the IMF northward. For By− the northward component is negative during a major part of the day indicating counterclockwise plasma flow around the pole. For By+, the situation is opposite, the electric field is directed poleward and the plasma rotate clockwise. These are confirmed nicely by the ESR observations.
电离层对流模拟与极帽欧洲非相干散射观测的比较与验证研究
[1]我们使用欧洲非相干散射(EISCAT)斯瓦尔巴雷达(ESR)获得的电离层速度测量值与基于场向流真实图的新电离层对流模型预测的电场分布进行了比较。模式输出和观测的对比分析是基于电离层电场南北分量和东西分量的数据。这样的比较提供了对模型的独立检查。结果表明,该模型准确地反映了由ESR测量的离子速度推断出的统计电场的大尺度特征。通过观测和建模,我们定量地确定了电离层电场强度对国际货币基金组织条件的依赖性,以及它如何随磁地方时变化。为了说明这种关系,我们推导了平均对流模式,以便根据IMF的大小和方向进行排序。通过对比IMF强度的两个量级(BT = 1和5nt)、IMF Bz分量的两个相反方向以及by +、by -的结果,可以清楚地看到这种依赖性。IMF的规模对南向IMF条件下的平均资金流有主要影响。IMF By的标志是影响IMF下对流系统向北的最重要因素。对于By−,在一天的大部分时间里,向北的分量是负的,这表明等离子体在极点周围逆时针流动。对于By+,情况正好相反,电场指向两极,等离子体顺时针旋转。ESR的观测结果很好地证实了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信