Trajectories of Treasured Texts: Laments as Narratives

K. Giaxoglou
{"title":"Trajectories of Treasured Texts: Laments as Narratives","authors":"K. Giaxoglou","doi":"10.1163/9789004393936_008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present chapter examines lament as a lens on the intersections between narrative, affect, and culture. Laments form an integral part of mourning rituals, and they are also attested in a range of ordinary contexts associated with work and leisure (Seremetakis, 1991) or with the recounting of painful life experiences, more broadly (de la Breteque, 2013). So far, however, little attention has been paid to the discursive forms and norms that make laments amenable to new contexts beyond rituals of mourning. This study seeks to fill this gap by proposing an approach to laments as narrative practices embedded in other social and cultural practices (De Fina and Georgakopoulou, 2012; 2015). This approach is illustrated in the case of a lament performance in the context of ethnographic fieldwork in Inner Mani (South Peloponnese, Greece) and supplemented by relevant findings from the analysis of a corpus of ‘treasured’ lament fragments, included in an unpublished, manuscript collection of laments from the 1930s. The analysis reveals regularized patterning in the lament performance at different levels – the acoustic, ethnopoetic, and narrative - and points to the conventionalized use of discourse devices for creating intertextual chains of stances, performances, and texts. Importantly, this multi-level patterning is revealing of different social practices in which lament performances are embedded, indexing contexts of telling as well as cueing the degree of affective and temporal distance from the recounted events. Regularized patterning and its associated discourse devices are described, here, as markers of entextualization, i.e. as traces of trajectories of lament, revealing of their differential telling and affective positions they make available to (co)tellers and audiences. The proposed approach to laments invites a cross-context and multi-level analysis of verbal art performances and texts as narrative practices connecting past, present, and future affectively. It contributes to the understanding of discourse processes of sharing affect and culture through narrative practices.","PeriodicalId":125892,"journal":{"name":"Storytelling as Narrative Practice","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Storytelling as Narrative Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004393936_008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present chapter examines lament as a lens on the intersections between narrative, affect, and culture. Laments form an integral part of mourning rituals, and they are also attested in a range of ordinary contexts associated with work and leisure (Seremetakis, 1991) or with the recounting of painful life experiences, more broadly (de la Breteque, 2013). So far, however, little attention has been paid to the discursive forms and norms that make laments amenable to new contexts beyond rituals of mourning. This study seeks to fill this gap by proposing an approach to laments as narrative practices embedded in other social and cultural practices (De Fina and Georgakopoulou, 2012; 2015). This approach is illustrated in the case of a lament performance in the context of ethnographic fieldwork in Inner Mani (South Peloponnese, Greece) and supplemented by relevant findings from the analysis of a corpus of ‘treasured’ lament fragments, included in an unpublished, manuscript collection of laments from the 1930s. The analysis reveals regularized patterning in the lament performance at different levels – the acoustic, ethnopoetic, and narrative - and points to the conventionalized use of discourse devices for creating intertextual chains of stances, performances, and texts. Importantly, this multi-level patterning is revealing of different social practices in which lament performances are embedded, indexing contexts of telling as well as cueing the degree of affective and temporal distance from the recounted events. Regularized patterning and its associated discourse devices are described, here, as markers of entextualization, i.e. as traces of trajectories of lament, revealing of their differential telling and affective positions they make available to (co)tellers and audiences. The proposed approach to laments invites a cross-context and multi-level analysis of verbal art performances and texts as narrative practices connecting past, present, and future affectively. It contributes to the understanding of discourse processes of sharing affect and culture through narrative practices.
珍贵文本的轨迹:作为叙事的哀歌
本章以叙事、情感和文化的交叉点为视角来审视悲歌。哀悼是哀悼仪式的一个组成部分,它们也在与工作和休闲相关的一系列普通背景中得到证实(Seremetakis, 1991),或者更广泛地讲述痛苦的生活经历(de la Breteque, 2013)。然而,到目前为止,很少有人注意到话语形式和规范,使哀悼服从新的背景超越哀悼仪式。本研究试图通过提出一种方法来填补这一空白,将悲伤作为嵌入其他社会和文化实践的叙事实践(De Fina和Georgakopoulou, 2012;2015)。这种方法在内马尼(希腊南伯罗奔尼撒半岛)民族学田野调查背景下的悲歌表演中得到了说明,并辅以对“珍贵”悲歌片段语料库分析的相关发现,这些片段包括在20世纪30年代未发表的悲歌手稿集中。分析揭示了哀歌表演在不同层面上的规则模式——声学、民族诗歌和叙事——并指出了话语手段的常规使用,以创造立场、表演和文本的互文链。重要的是,这种多层次的模式揭示了不同的社会实践,在这些社会实践中,哀歌表演被嵌入其中,索引了讲述的背景,并提示了与叙述事件的情感和时间距离的程度。规范化模式及其相关的话语手段在这里被描述为外化的标记,即作为悲歌轨迹的痕迹,揭示了它们的不同讲述和情感立场,它们为讲述者和受众提供了可用的信息。所提出的哀歌方法要求对语言艺术表演和文本进行跨语境和多层次的分析,作为将过去、现在和未来有效地联系起来的叙事实践。它有助于理解通过叙事实践分享情感和文化的话语过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信