{"title":"The Effect of Outlet Manifold Location of Liquid-Cooled Battery Thermal Management Systems on Pumping Power","authors":"Kuuku-Dadzie Botchway, M. Shaeri","doi":"10.11159/htff22.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydrothermal performances of two water-cooled thermal management systems (TMSs) for cooling lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are compared through three-dimensional simulations of laminar flow and heat transfer in TMSs, as well as conduction heat transfer with volumetric heat generation inside the battery cell. Maximum cell temperature and temperature variation across the cell are used to evaluate thermal performances of TMSs. The TMSs are different from each other by location of outlet manifold. In the bottom outlet (BO) design, the outlet is located at the bottom of the TMS’s case, while in the middle outlet (MO) design, the outlet manifold is located at the middle of the TMS’s case. Both designs provide safe operational temperature for LIBs, although the thermal performance of BO design is slightly higher than that of the MO design. This is due to distribution of water over a larger surface area in the BO TMS compared with the MO TMS. To provide a better insight on practical applications of TMSs, their thermal performances are described based on pumping power. Due to a shorter path from the inlet to the outlet in the MO design, compared with the BO design, the pressure drop is lower in the MO TMS. As a result, at a given flow rate, the MO TMS operates with a lower pumping power compared with the BO TMS. The present study suggests that selecting an appropriate TMS highly depends on design priorities. If the main goal is to maintain the cell temperature as low as possible, the BO design is an effective TMS. If the design goal is to minimize the pumping power, the MO TMS is an effective cooling system.","PeriodicalId":385356,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/htff22.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hydrothermal performances of two water-cooled thermal management systems (TMSs) for cooling lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are compared through three-dimensional simulations of laminar flow and heat transfer in TMSs, as well as conduction heat transfer with volumetric heat generation inside the battery cell. Maximum cell temperature and temperature variation across the cell are used to evaluate thermal performances of TMSs. The TMSs are different from each other by location of outlet manifold. In the bottom outlet (BO) design, the outlet is located at the bottom of the TMS’s case, while in the middle outlet (MO) design, the outlet manifold is located at the middle of the TMS’s case. Both designs provide safe operational temperature for LIBs, although the thermal performance of BO design is slightly higher than that of the MO design. This is due to distribution of water over a larger surface area in the BO TMS compared with the MO TMS. To provide a better insight on practical applications of TMSs, their thermal performances are described based on pumping power. Due to a shorter path from the inlet to the outlet in the MO design, compared with the BO design, the pressure drop is lower in the MO TMS. As a result, at a given flow rate, the MO TMS operates with a lower pumping power compared with the BO TMS. The present study suggests that selecting an appropriate TMS highly depends on design priorities. If the main goal is to maintain the cell temperature as low as possible, the BO design is an effective TMS. If the design goal is to minimize the pumping power, the MO TMS is an effective cooling system.