A Dívida Ativa Tributária e não Tributária na Recuperação Judicial: Análise de Decisões Conflitantes do STJ

Vinicius dos Santos Silva, Felipe de Poli de Siqueira, Francieli Micheletto de Siqueira
{"title":"A Dívida Ativa Tributária e não Tributária na Recuperação Judicial: Análise de Decisões Conflitantes do STJ","authors":"Vinicius dos Santos Silva, Felipe de Poli de Siqueira, Francieli Micheletto de Siqueira","doi":"10.46801/2595-6280-rdta-43-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fiscal enforcement in judicial recovery is dealt with in a restricted manner and has been interpreted differently between the first and second sections of the STJ. In this study, the legal and jurisprudential approach brought about in relation to the suspension of tax enforcement against judicial reorganization is analyzed in this study. It is well known that, in general, expropriatory acts must be suspended when deferring the processing of judicial recovery, how-ever, art. 6, paragraph 7, of the Law on Recovery and Bankruptcy provides that tax foreclosures will not be suspended in this process. At the heart of this study is the problem of the nature of the public debt, which helps to make this subject even more intriguing but at the same time instigating.","PeriodicalId":246149,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Direito Tributário Atual","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Direito Tributário Atual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-6280-rdta-43-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fiscal enforcement in judicial recovery is dealt with in a restricted manner and has been interpreted differently between the first and second sections of the STJ. In this study, the legal and jurisprudential approach brought about in relation to the suspension of tax enforcement against judicial reorganization is analyzed in this study. It is well known that, in general, expropriatory acts must be suspended when deferring the processing of judicial recovery, how-ever, art. 6, paragraph 7, of the Law on Recovery and Bankruptcy provides that tax foreclosures will not be suspended in this process. At the heart of this study is the problem of the nature of the public debt, which helps to make this subject even more intriguing but at the same time instigating.
司法重组中的税收和非税收主动债务:法院冲突判决的分析
司法追偿中的财政执行是以一种有限的方式处理的,在《STJ》第一节和第二节之间有不同的解释。在本研究中,本研究分析了与司法重组暂停税收执行有关的法律和法理学方法。众所周知,在一般情况下,在推迟司法追回程序时,必须暂停征收行为。《恢复和破产法》第6段第7款规定,在这一过程中不会暂停征收税款。这项研究的核心是公共债务的性质问题,这有助于使这个主题更加有趣,但同时也具有煽动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书