Vinicius dos Santos Silva, Felipe de Poli de Siqueira, Francieli Micheletto de Siqueira
{"title":"A Dívida Ativa Tributária e não Tributária na Recuperação Judicial: Análise de Decisões Conflitantes do STJ","authors":"Vinicius dos Santos Silva, Felipe de Poli de Siqueira, Francieli Micheletto de Siqueira","doi":"10.46801/2595-6280-rdta-43-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fiscal enforcement in judicial recovery is dealt with in a restricted manner and has been interpreted differently between the first and second sections of the STJ. In this study, the legal and jurisprudential approach brought about in relation to the suspension of tax enforcement against judicial reorganization is analyzed in this study. It is well known that, in general, expropriatory acts must be suspended when deferring the processing of judicial recovery, how-ever, art. 6, paragraph 7, of the Law on Recovery and Bankruptcy provides that tax foreclosures will not be suspended in this process. At the heart of this study is the problem of the nature of the public debt, which helps to make this subject even more intriguing but at the same time instigating.","PeriodicalId":246149,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Direito Tributário Atual","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Direito Tributário Atual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46801/2595-6280-rdta-43-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fiscal enforcement in judicial recovery is dealt with in a restricted manner and has been interpreted differently between the first and second sections of the STJ. In this study, the legal and jurisprudential approach brought about in relation to the suspension of tax enforcement against judicial reorganization is analyzed in this study. It is well known that, in general, expropriatory acts must be suspended when deferring the processing of judicial recovery, how-ever, art. 6, paragraph 7, of the Law on Recovery and Bankruptcy provides that tax foreclosures will not be suspended in this process. At the heart of this study is the problem of the nature of the public debt, which helps to make this subject even more intriguing but at the same time instigating.