A Comparative Study on Theories of the Nature of the Mind in Confucianism and in Daesoon Jinrihoe

Yong-bok Yoon
{"title":"A Comparative Study on Theories of the Nature of the Mind in\n Confucianism and in Daesoon Jinrihoe","authors":"Yong-bok Yoon","doi":"10.25050/JDAOS.2019.32.0.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theories on the nature of the mind aim to accurately describe the nature of the human mind. In other words, these theories are meant to discover what the human mind ultimately is and what its nature is. In this study, I try to understand the theory of the nature of the mind in Daesoon Jinrihoe in connection to similar theories in Confucianism. Like in Confucianism, the issue of mind is an important subject in Daesoon Jinrihoe. The concept of ‘mind’ as presented in ‘The Jeon-Gyeong’ is connected to gods. But in ‘The Jeon-Gyeong,’ there is no premise that the mind is good or evil. It suggests that the mind is the center of humanity and the universe and that all things depend on the mind. Therefore it is understood that good and evil are revealed according to the actions of the mind. Conscience (良心) and self-interest (私心) are mentioned in ‘Essentials of Daesoon Jinrihoe’. If conscience is understood as benevolence (仁) as spoken of by Confucius, or as Moral Knowledge in Mencius’s usage, more advanced discussion can be made. If looked upon in that way, one can conclude that conscience is the nature of the * 아시아종교연구원 원장, E-mail: yoonyongb@hanmail.net 2 대순사상논총 제32집 / 기획논문 mind and thereby, the nature of humans and their minds is good. Discussions on the nature of the mind can also be explained in relation to the concept of ‘a Singularly-focused Mind (一心)’, which was frequently emphasized by Jeungsan. The two mindsets of conscience and self-interest are mentioned, but the original mind is only conscience which exists as the nature of heaven (天性). Self-interest is nothing but an illusion. As Zhu Xi explained that even if a saint (聖人) thought of utterly nothing, he would became a madman, and therefore people should look closely and realize that self-interest is nothing but a delusion. Accordingly, when returning to one’s conscience, the orignal state of a singularly-focused mind, it becomes the sort of Singularly-focused Mind that Jeungsan emphasized. In other words, self-interest is a form of greed that is born out of worldly desires.","PeriodicalId":115590,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25050/JDAOS.2019.32.0.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Theories on the nature of the mind aim to accurately describe the nature of the human mind. In other words, these theories are meant to discover what the human mind ultimately is and what its nature is. In this study, I try to understand the theory of the nature of the mind in Daesoon Jinrihoe in connection to similar theories in Confucianism. Like in Confucianism, the issue of mind is an important subject in Daesoon Jinrihoe. The concept of ‘mind’ as presented in ‘The Jeon-Gyeong’ is connected to gods. But in ‘The Jeon-Gyeong,’ there is no premise that the mind is good or evil. It suggests that the mind is the center of humanity and the universe and that all things depend on the mind. Therefore it is understood that good and evil are revealed according to the actions of the mind. Conscience (良心) and self-interest (私心) are mentioned in ‘Essentials of Daesoon Jinrihoe’. If conscience is understood as benevolence (仁) as spoken of by Confucius, or as Moral Knowledge in Mencius’s usage, more advanced discussion can be made. If looked upon in that way, one can conclude that conscience is the nature of the * 아시아종교연구원 원장, E-mail: yoonyongb@hanmail.net 2 대순사상논총 제32집 / 기획논문 mind and thereby, the nature of humans and their minds is good. Discussions on the nature of the mind can also be explained in relation to the concept of ‘a Singularly-focused Mind (一心)’, which was frequently emphasized by Jeungsan. The two mindsets of conscience and self-interest are mentioned, but the original mind is only conscience which exists as the nature of heaven (天性). Self-interest is nothing but an illusion. As Zhu Xi explained that even if a saint (聖人) thought of utterly nothing, he would became a madman, and therefore people should look closely and realize that self-interest is nothing but a delusion. Accordingly, when returning to one’s conscience, the orignal state of a singularly-focused mind, it becomes the sort of Singularly-focused Mind that Jeungsan emphasized. In other words, self-interest is a form of greed that is born out of worldly desires.
儒家心性论与大田真日会心性论之比较研究
关于心灵本质的理论旨在准确地描述人类心灵的本质。换句话说,这些理论的目的是发现人类的思想最终是什么以及它的本质是什么。在这项研究中,我试图将《大宣真日会》的心性理论与儒家的类似理论联系起来。与儒家思想一样,《大宣真日会》中的心灵问题也是一个重要的主题。《全经》中的“心”概念与神有关。但在《全景》中,没有关于思想是善还是恶的前提。它表明心灵是人类和宇宙的中心,所有的事情都依赖于心灵。因此可以理解,善与恶是根据心灵的行为而显现的。《大宣真理会要义》中提到了良心和私利。如果把良心理解为孔子所说的“仁”,或者理解为孟子所说的“道德知识”,就可以进行更深入的讨论。如果这样看,我们可以得出这样的结论:意识的本质是*아시아종교연구원원장,电子邮件:yoonyongb@hanmail.net 2대순사상논총32집/제기획논문思想,因此,人类和他们的思想的本质是好的。关于心灵本质的讨论,也可以用郑山经常强调的“一心一意”的概念来解释。虽然提到了良心和自利两种心态,但本心只是作为天性而存在的良心。自利只不过是一种幻觉。正如朱熹所解释的那样,即使圣人什么都不想,他也会变成疯子,因此人们应该仔细观察并意识到自我利益只不过是一种错觉。因此,当回到良知时,也就是回归到“一心一意”的原始状态时,就变成了郑山所强调的“一心一意”。换句话说,自利是一种贪婪的形式,产生于世俗的欲望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信