GLOBALLY VERSUS COMPACTLY SUPPORTED RBFS

E. Kansa
{"title":"GLOBALLY VERSUS COMPACTLY SUPPORTED RBFS","authors":"E. Kansa","doi":"10.2495/AFM180251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many years, a debate has occurred whether radial basis functions having compact support (CS) or global support (GS) is best for engineering and scientific applications. CS RBFs converge as O(h(k+1)), h is the fill distance, and its systems of equations have many zeros. In contrast, GS RBFs converge as O((c/h)),  <1, c is the GS-RBF shape parameter. Previously, the barrier to exploiting the exponential convergence rate of GS-RBFs has been the ill-conditioning problem that is due to computer chip restrictions on the relatively large machine epsilon. Although computer chips with arbitrary precision are very rare presently, extended precision software has allowed the exploitation of the exponential convergence rates of GS-RBFs. When attempting modeling of higher dimension practical problems, previous methods such as domain decomposition, global optimization, pre-conditioning will need to be blended even on massively parallel computers.","PeriodicalId":261351,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Fluid Mechanics XII","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Fluid Mechanics XII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/AFM180251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For many years, a debate has occurred whether radial basis functions having compact support (CS) or global support (GS) is best for engineering and scientific applications. CS RBFs converge as O(h(k+1)), h is the fill distance, and its systems of equations have many zeros. In contrast, GS RBFs converge as O((c/h)),  <1, c is the GS-RBF shape parameter. Previously, the barrier to exploiting the exponential convergence rate of GS-RBFs has been the ill-conditioning problem that is due to computer chip restrictions on the relatively large machine epsilon. Although computer chips with arbitrary precision are very rare presently, extended precision software has allowed the exploitation of the exponential convergence rates of GS-RBFs. When attempting modeling of higher dimension practical problems, previous methods such as domain decomposition, global optimization, pre-conditioning will need to be blended even on massively parallel computers.
全局支持与紧凑支持的RBFS
多年来,关于径向基函数是否具有紧凑支持(CS)或全局支持(GS)是最适合工程和科学应用的争论一直存在。CS rbf收敛于0 (h(k+1)), h为填充距离,其方程组有多个零。相比之下,GS- rbf收敛为O( (c/h)),其中 <1, c为GS- rbf形状参数。以前,利用gs - rbf的指数收敛速度的障碍是由于计算机芯片对相对较大的机器epsilon的限制而导致的病态问题。虽然目前具有任意精度的计算机芯片非常罕见,但扩展精度的软件已经允许利用gs - rbf的指数收敛率。当尝试对高维实际问题建模时,即使在大规模并行计算机上,也需要混合以前的方法,如域分解、全局优化、预处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信