Hypothesis testing for matched pairs with missing data by maximum mean discrepancy: An application to continuous glucose monitoring

M. Matabuena, Paulo F'elix, Marc Ditzhaus, J. Vidal, F. Gudé
{"title":"Hypothesis testing for matched pairs with missing data by maximum mean discrepancy: An application to continuous glucose monitoring","authors":"M. Matabuena, Paulo F'elix, Marc Ditzhaus, J. Vidal, F. Gudé","doi":"10.1080/00031305.2023.2200512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A frequent problem in statistical science is how to properly handle missing data in matched paired observations. There is a large body of literature coping with the univariate case. Yet, the ongoing technological progress in measuring biological systems raises the need for addressing more complex data, e.g., graphs, strings and probability distributions, among others. In order to fill this gap, this paper proposes new estimators of the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to handle complex matched pairs with missing data. These estimators can detect differences in data distributions under different missingness mechanisms. The validity of this approach is proven and further studied in an extensive simulation study, and results of statistical consistency are provided. Data from continuous glucose monitoring in a longitudinal population-based diabetes study are used to illustrate the application of this approach. By employing the new distributional representations together with cluster analysis, new clinical criteria on how glucose changes vary at the distributional level over five years can be explored.","PeriodicalId":342642,"journal":{"name":"The American Statistician","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Statistician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2023.2200512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A frequent problem in statistical science is how to properly handle missing data in matched paired observations. There is a large body of literature coping with the univariate case. Yet, the ongoing technological progress in measuring biological systems raises the need for addressing more complex data, e.g., graphs, strings and probability distributions, among others. In order to fill this gap, this paper proposes new estimators of the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to handle complex matched pairs with missing data. These estimators can detect differences in data distributions under different missingness mechanisms. The validity of this approach is proven and further studied in an extensive simulation study, and results of statistical consistency are provided. Data from continuous glucose monitoring in a longitudinal population-based diabetes study are used to illustrate the application of this approach. By employing the new distributional representations together with cluster analysis, new clinical criteria on how glucose changes vary at the distributional level over five years can be explored.
用最大平均差异对缺失数据配对的假设检验:在连续血糖监测中的应用
统计科学中经常遇到的一个问题是如何正确处理匹配成对观测中的缺失数据。有大量的文献论述单变量的情况。然而,测量生物系统的持续技术进步提出了处理更复杂数据的需求,例如图、字符串和概率分布等。为了填补这一空白,本文提出了一种新的最大平均差异估计方法来处理具有缺失数据的复杂匹配对。这些估计器可以检测不同缺失机制下数据分布的差异。该方法的有效性在广泛的仿真研究中得到了证明和进一步的研究,并提供了统计一致性的结果。在一项基于纵向人群的糖尿病研究中,连续血糖监测的数据被用来说明这种方法的应用。通过采用新的分布表示和聚类分析,可以探索五年内葡萄糖在分布水平上变化的新临床标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信