Verification of fatigue load model for stay cables

Heikki Lilja, Atte Mikkonen
{"title":"Verification of fatigue load model for stay cables","authors":"Heikki Lilja, Atte Mikkonen","doi":"10.2749/prague.2022.0820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of an adequate fatigue load model for the design of a cable-stayed bridge is an important task, since the shape of the S-N-curve for stay cables is very sensitive to slight changes in stress ranges. On one hand too light a fatigue load model may lead to a theoretically unsafe structure, and on the other hand too severe a fatigue load model may easily lead to unnecessary costs and waste of material, compromising sustainability.Eurocodes, in general, apply only to loaded lengths of up to 200 meters. The fatigue load models have been calibrated against beam models, and they currently lack the needed tools for application to medium to long-span cable-stayed bridges.Some European countries, including Finland, have relatively high traffic loads (up to 76 ton vehicles allowed), which have not been accounted for in the background calculations for current presented fatigue load models.In this paper, the different Eurocode fatigue load models (FLM1…FLM4) are discussed within the context of a case bridge with 250-meter main span. In addition, a method for verifying the fatigue load model based on the available traffic data and maximum allowed vehicle in Finland is presented. The presented method gives the decision makers an assurance that the chosen load model can be used economically without compromising the safety of the structure.","PeriodicalId":168532,"journal":{"name":"IABSE Symposium, Prague 2022: Challenges for Existing and Oncoming Structures","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IABSE Symposium, Prague 2022: Challenges for Existing and Oncoming Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2749/prague.2022.0820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The selection of an adequate fatigue load model for the design of a cable-stayed bridge is an important task, since the shape of the S-N-curve for stay cables is very sensitive to slight changes in stress ranges. On one hand too light a fatigue load model may lead to a theoretically unsafe structure, and on the other hand too severe a fatigue load model may easily lead to unnecessary costs and waste of material, compromising sustainability.Eurocodes, in general, apply only to loaded lengths of up to 200 meters. The fatigue load models have been calibrated against beam models, and they currently lack the needed tools for application to medium to long-span cable-stayed bridges.Some European countries, including Finland, have relatively high traffic loads (up to 76 ton vehicles allowed), which have not been accounted for in the background calculations for current presented fatigue load models.In this paper, the different Eurocode fatigue load models (FLM1…FLM4) are discussed within the context of a case bridge with 250-meter main span. In addition, a method for verifying the fatigue load model based on the available traffic data and maximum allowed vehicle in Finland is presented. The presented method gives the decision makers an assurance that the chosen load model can be used economically without compromising the safety of the structure.
斜拉索疲劳荷载模型的验证
斜拉桥的s - n曲线的形状对应力范围的微小变化非常敏感,因此为斜拉桥的设计选择适当的疲劳荷载模型是一项重要的任务。一方面,过于轻的疲劳荷载模型可能导致理论上不安全的结构,另一方面,过于严重的疲劳荷载模型容易导致不必要的成本和材料浪费,影响可持续性。一般来说,欧洲规范只适用于加载长度不超过200米的电缆。疲劳荷载模型已经根据梁模型进行了校准,目前它们缺乏应用于中跨到大跨度斜拉桥所需的工具。一些欧洲国家,包括芬兰,有相对较高的交通负荷(高达76吨车辆允许),这在当前提出的疲劳负荷模型的背景计算中没有考虑到。本文以主跨250米的箱式桥梁为例,讨论了不同的欧洲规范疲劳荷载模型(FLM1…FLM4)。此外,提出了一种基于芬兰现有交通数据和最大允许车辆的疲劳载荷模型验证方法。该方法为决策者提供了一个保证,即所选择的荷载模型可以在不影响结构安全的情况下经济地使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信