{"title":"FIR Filter Realization Under the Trade-Off Between Implementation Complexity and Computation Rate","authors":"Abhishek Kumar, S. Yadav, N. Purohit","doi":"10.1109/CICT48419.2019.9066232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a flexible finite impulse response (FIR) filter structure which can avail the benefits of trade-off between computation units and clock rate. For designing such flexible FIR filter, we first present two supporting structures viz., Structure I and Structure II. Structure I realizes the FIR filter via single multiplier, single adder, and $N$ delays, where all units operate at the rate of $Nf_{in}$ (i.e., high clock rate), and $N$ and $f_{\\mathrm{i}n}$ denote the order of FIR filter and input sampling frequency, respectively, whereas Structure II implements the FIR filter using NM multipliers, M N - M2 adders, and M N - M2 delays in the filter unit with clock rate $\\displaystyle \\frac{f_{in}}{M}$ (i.e., computationally low-speed realization), and $M-1$ adders and delays at the output unit operate at $f_{in}$, where 2 $\\leq M \\leq N$ and $M$ denotes the upsampler/downsampler. Then, we propose Structure III via Structures I & II, which provides the flexible realization of FIR filters under the trade-off between computational units and clock rate. We also analyze the performance of these structures in terms of number of multipliers $(C_{M})$, number of adders $(C_{A})$, number of delays $(C_{D})$, and operating frequency $(F_{opt})$ with the help of numerical example in comparison of the direct form FIR filter.","PeriodicalId":234540,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technology","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Conference on Information and Communication Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CICT48419.2019.9066232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We propose a flexible finite impulse response (FIR) filter structure which can avail the benefits of trade-off between computation units and clock rate. For designing such flexible FIR filter, we first present two supporting structures viz., Structure I and Structure II. Structure I realizes the FIR filter via single multiplier, single adder, and $N$ delays, where all units operate at the rate of $Nf_{in}$ (i.e., high clock rate), and $N$ and $f_{\mathrm{i}n}$ denote the order of FIR filter and input sampling frequency, respectively, whereas Structure II implements the FIR filter using NM multipliers, M N - M2 adders, and M N - M2 delays in the filter unit with clock rate $\displaystyle \frac{f_{in}}{M}$ (i.e., computationally low-speed realization), and $M-1$ adders and delays at the output unit operate at $f_{in}$, where 2 $\leq M \leq N$ and $M$ denotes the upsampler/downsampler. Then, we propose Structure III via Structures I & II, which provides the flexible realization of FIR filters under the trade-off between computational units and clock rate. We also analyze the performance of these structures in terms of number of multipliers $(C_{M})$, number of adders $(C_{A})$, number of delays $(C_{D})$, and operating frequency $(F_{opt})$ with the help of numerical example in comparison of the direct form FIR filter.
我们提出了一种灵活的有限脉冲响应(FIR)滤波器结构,它可以利用计算单元和时钟速率之间的权衡优势。为了设计这种柔性FIR滤波器,我们首先提出了两种支撑结构,即结构I和结构II。结构I通过单个乘法器、单个加法器和$N$延迟实现FIR滤波器,其中所有单元的工作速率为$Nf_{in}$(即高时钟速率),$N$和$f_{\mathrm{i}n}$分别表示FIR滤波器的阶数和输入采样频率,而结构II使用时钟速率为$\displaystyle \frac{f_{in}}{M}$的滤波器单元中的NM乘法器、M N - M2加法器和M N - M2延迟来实现FIR滤波器。计算低速实现),$M-1$输出单元的加法器和延迟运行在$f_{in}$,其中2 $\leq M \leq N$和$M$表示上采样器/下采样器。然后,我们通过结构I和结构II提出结构III,在计算单元和时钟速率之间权衡的情况下,提供了FIR滤波器的灵活实现。我们还分析了这些结构在乘法器数量$(C_{M})$、加法器数量$(C_{A})$、延迟数量$(C_{D})$和工作频率$(F_{opt})$方面的性能,并通过数值例子与直接形式FIR滤波器进行了比较。