Maria F Valdez, Jessica R. Stewart, Ruth Crutchfield, Wan-Lin Chang, Ralph Carlson
{"title":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening Practices in the United States and Mexico","authors":"Maria F Valdez, Jessica R. Stewart, Ruth Crutchfield, Wan-Lin Chang, Ralph Carlson","doi":"10.51734/crdr.v3i2.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore screening practices for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in Mexico and the United States (U.S.). \nMethods: Data from a larger study exploring the knowledge, screening, and diagnostic practices of healthcare practitioners from Mexico and the U.S. was used for the current study. The original survey was created by experts in ASD and consisted of 63 questions: 15 demographic questions, 20 questions relating to knowledge of ASD, 11 questions relating to screening practices, and 17 questions relating to diagnostic practices. All surveys were completed by professionals engaging in the screening and diagnosis of ASD. For this study, a total of thirty- five survey responses for the screening portion of the survey (30 from the U.S. and 5 from Mexico) were explored. Qualitative data and descriptive statistics were utilized. \nResults: Many of the responses relating to screening practices from professionals practicing in Mexico and the U.S. were consistent with best practice guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Mexican Public Health Guide. Furthermore, many similarities were found in the screening practices of professionals from both countries. Differences in screening practices reported by professionals from Mexico and the U.S. were found in the type of professional involved in the screening process and professional referrals after a failed ASD screening. Additionally, some professionals from both the U.S. and Mexico reported the use of inappropriate screening tools, and the average age reportedly screened was much higher than the current recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics (Hyman et al., 2020). \nConclusion: An understanding of the screening practices currently being used in Mexico and the U.S. provides both researchers and clinicians with a better understanding of what is being implemented by different professionals. This study identified areas of strength and areas of weaknesses in the screening process for ASD in both countries. These results can now be used in future studies and programs targeting improved screening processes in Mexico in the U.S. Improved screening processes are important because of the potential to result in an earlier age of diagnosis of ASD and provision of services at a younger age. The latter of which is associated with better outcomes for children with ASD. \nKeywords: autism spectrum disorder, screening, Mexico, United States.","PeriodicalId":101649,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Research in Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":"367 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Research in Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51734/crdr.v3i2.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore screening practices for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in Mexico and the United States (U.S.).
Methods: Data from a larger study exploring the knowledge, screening, and diagnostic practices of healthcare practitioners from Mexico and the U.S. was used for the current study. The original survey was created by experts in ASD and consisted of 63 questions: 15 demographic questions, 20 questions relating to knowledge of ASD, 11 questions relating to screening practices, and 17 questions relating to diagnostic practices. All surveys were completed by professionals engaging in the screening and diagnosis of ASD. For this study, a total of thirty- five survey responses for the screening portion of the survey (30 from the U.S. and 5 from Mexico) were explored. Qualitative data and descriptive statistics were utilized.
Results: Many of the responses relating to screening practices from professionals practicing in Mexico and the U.S. were consistent with best practice guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Mexican Public Health Guide. Furthermore, many similarities were found in the screening practices of professionals from both countries. Differences in screening practices reported by professionals from Mexico and the U.S. were found in the type of professional involved in the screening process and professional referrals after a failed ASD screening. Additionally, some professionals from both the U.S. and Mexico reported the use of inappropriate screening tools, and the average age reportedly screened was much higher than the current recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics (Hyman et al., 2020).
Conclusion: An understanding of the screening practices currently being used in Mexico and the U.S. provides both researchers and clinicians with a better understanding of what is being implemented by different professionals. This study identified areas of strength and areas of weaknesses in the screening process for ASD in both countries. These results can now be used in future studies and programs targeting improved screening processes in Mexico in the U.S. Improved screening processes are important because of the potential to result in an earlier age of diagnosis of ASD and provision of services at a younger age. The latter of which is associated with better outcomes for children with ASD.
Keywords: autism spectrum disorder, screening, Mexico, United States.
目的:本研究的目的是探讨墨西哥和美国的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)筛查实践。方法:数据来自一个更大的研究,探索知识,筛选,并从墨西哥和美国的医疗保健从业人员的诊断实践被用于当前的研究。最初的调查是由自闭症专家创建的,包括63个问题:15个人口统计问题,20个与自闭症知识有关的问题,11个与筛查实践有关的问题,17个与诊断实践有关的问题。所有调查均由从事ASD筛查和诊断的专业人员完成。在这项研究中,总共有35个调查回应作为调查的筛选部分(30个来自美国,5个来自墨西哥)被探讨。采用定性数据和描述性统计。结果:在墨西哥和美国执业的专业人员对筛查实践的许多回应与疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)、美国儿科学会(AAP)和墨西哥公共卫生指南的最佳实践指南一致。此外,两国专业人员的筛选实践也有许多相似之处。来自墨西哥和美国的专业人员在筛查过程中涉及的专业人员类型和ASD筛查失败后的专业转诊中发现了筛查实践的差异。此外,来自美国和墨西哥的一些专业人士报告说,他们使用了不适当的筛查工具,据报道,接受筛查的平均年龄远高于美国儿科学会目前的建议(Hyman et al., 2020)。结论:了解目前在墨西哥和美国使用的筛查做法,可以使研究人员和临床医生更好地了解不同专业人员正在实施的措施。这项研究确定了两国在筛查自闭症谱系障碍过程中的优势和劣势。这些结果现在可以用于未来的研究和项目,目标是改善美国墨西哥的筛查过程。改善筛查过程很重要,因为有可能导致自闭症谱系障碍的早期诊断,并在更年轻的年龄提供服务。后者与自闭症儿童的预后更好有关。关键词:自闭症谱系障碍,筛查,墨西哥,美国