Amino acid substitution of proteins coded for in mitochondrial DNA during mammalian evolution.

Idengaku zasshi Pub Date : 1992-06-01 DOI:10.1266/jjg.67.187
J Adachi, M Hasegawa
{"title":"Amino acid substitution of proteins coded for in mitochondrial DNA during mammalian evolution.","authors":"J Adachi,&nbsp;M Hasegawa","doi":"10.1266/jjg.67.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three Markov models (Dayhoff, Proportional and Poisson models; Hasegawa et al., 1992a) for amino acid substitution during evolution were used for maximum likelihood analyses of proteins coded for in mitochondrial DNA in estimating a phylogenetic tree among human, bovine and murids (mouse and rat) with chicken as an outgroup. It turned out that Dayhoff model is the most appropriate model among the alternatives in approximating the amino acid substitutions of proteins coded for in mitochondrial DNA. In spite of the presence of the complete sequence data of mitochondrial genomes, we could not resolve the trichotomy among human, bovine and murids, probably because the time length separating two branching events among these three lines was short and because chicken is too distant from mammals to be used as an outgroup. It was suggested that the average substitution rate of amino acids coded for in mitochondrial DNA is lower along the bovine line than those along the human or murid lines. Advantages of amino acid sequence analysis over nucleotide sequence analysis in phylogenetic study were discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13120,"journal":{"name":"Idengaku zasshi","volume":"67 3","pages":"187-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1266/jjg.67.187","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Idengaku zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1266/jjg.67.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Three Markov models (Dayhoff, Proportional and Poisson models; Hasegawa et al., 1992a) for amino acid substitution during evolution were used for maximum likelihood analyses of proteins coded for in mitochondrial DNA in estimating a phylogenetic tree among human, bovine and murids (mouse and rat) with chicken as an outgroup. It turned out that Dayhoff model is the most appropriate model among the alternatives in approximating the amino acid substitutions of proteins coded for in mitochondrial DNA. In spite of the presence of the complete sequence data of mitochondrial genomes, we could not resolve the trichotomy among human, bovine and murids, probably because the time length separating two branching events among these three lines was short and because chicken is too distant from mammals to be used as an outgroup. It was suggested that the average substitution rate of amino acids coded for in mitochondrial DNA is lower along the bovine line than those along the human or murid lines. Advantages of amino acid sequence analysis over nucleotide sequence analysis in phylogenetic study were discussed.

哺乳动物进化过程中线粒体DNA编码蛋白质的氨基酸替代。
三种马尔可夫模型(Dayhoff、Proportional和Poisson模型);Hasegawa等人,1992a)对进化过程中的氨基酸替代进行了最大似然分析,对线粒体DNA编码的蛋白质进行了最大似然分析,以估计人类、牛和鼠(小鼠和大鼠)(鸡为外群)之间的系统发育树。结果表明,Dayhoff模型在模拟线粒体DNA编码蛋白质的氨基酸取代过程中是最合适的模型。尽管有完整的线粒体基因组序列数据,但我们无法解决人类、牛和鼠的三分法问题,这可能是因为这三个系之间分离两个分支事件的时间长度很短,而且鸡与哺乳动物距离太远,不能作为外群。结果表明,牛系线粒体DNA编码氨基酸的平均取代率低于人系和鼠系。讨论了氨基酸序列分析相对于核苷酸序列分析在系统发育研究中的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信