{"title":"Three Critics","authors":"Frederick C. Beiser","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198859857.003.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the criticisms of three prominent Strauß critics: Nietzsche, Treitschke, and Schweitzer. Nietzsche’s criticism is disarmed by showing how it applies entirely to the later Strauß; though he does not admit it, Nietzsche was inspired by the early Strauß. Treitschke’s critique of Strauß fails because it accuses Strauß of problems that he foresaw and already replied to. Although Schweitzer was very sympathetic to Strauβ and truly appreciated his achievement, his criticisms of Strauβ—that his critique is too negative—do not carry much weight because they do not consider the problems anyone would face in coming to more positive conclusions.","PeriodicalId":282224,"journal":{"name":"David Friedrich Strauß, Father of Unbelief","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"David Friedrich Strauß, Father of Unbelief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859857.003.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This chapter examines the criticisms of three prominent Strauß critics: Nietzsche, Treitschke, and Schweitzer. Nietzsche’s criticism is disarmed by showing how it applies entirely to the later Strauß; though he does not admit it, Nietzsche was inspired by the early Strauß. Treitschke’s critique of Strauß fails because it accuses Strauß of problems that he foresaw and already replied to. Although Schweitzer was very sympathetic to Strauβ and truly appreciated his achievement, his criticisms of Strauβ—that his critique is too negative—do not carry much weight because they do not consider the problems anyone would face in coming to more positive conclusions.