Three Critics

Frederick C. Beiser
{"title":"Three Critics","authors":"Frederick C. Beiser","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198859857.003.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the criticisms of three prominent Strauß critics: Nietzsche, Treitschke, and Schweitzer. Nietzsche’s criticism is disarmed by showing how it applies entirely to the later Strauß; though he does not admit it, Nietzsche was inspired by the early Strauß. Treitschke’s critique of Strauß fails because it accuses Strauß of problems that he foresaw and already replied to. Although Schweitzer was very sympathetic to Strauβ‎ and truly appreciated his achievement, his criticisms of Strauβ‎—that his critique is too negative—do not carry much weight because they do not consider the problems anyone would face in coming to more positive conclusions.","PeriodicalId":282224,"journal":{"name":"David Friedrich Strauß, Father of Unbelief","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"David Friedrich Strauß, Father of Unbelief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859857.003.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter examines the criticisms of three prominent Strauß critics: Nietzsche, Treitschke, and Schweitzer. Nietzsche’s criticism is disarmed by showing how it applies entirely to the later Strauß; though he does not admit it, Nietzsche was inspired by the early Strauß. Treitschke’s critique of Strauß fails because it accuses Strauß of problems that he foresaw and already replied to. Although Schweitzer was very sympathetic to Strauβ‎ and truly appreciated his achievement, his criticisms of Strauβ‎—that his critique is too negative—do not carry much weight because they do not consider the problems anyone would face in coming to more positive conclusions.
三个批评家
本章考察了三位著名的施特劳斯批评家的批评:尼采、特雷奇克和施韦策。尼采的批判被解除了武装通过展示它如何完全适用于后来的施特劳斯;虽然他不承认,但尼采确实受到了早期施特劳斯的启发。特雷奇克对施特劳斯的批评失败了,因为他指责施特劳斯提出了他预见到并已经回答过的问题。尽管施韦策非常同情斯特劳β,并真正欣赏他的成就,但他对斯特劳β的批评——他的批评太消极了——没有多大分量,因为他们没有考虑到任何人在得出更积极的结论时都会面临的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信