Assessing Financial Vulnerability in the Nonprofit Sector

E. Keating, M. Fischer, Teresa P. Gordon, J. Greenlee
{"title":"Assessing Financial Vulnerability in the Nonprofit Sector","authors":"E. Keating, M. Fischer, Teresa P. Gordon, J. Greenlee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.647662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective nonprofit governance relies upon understanding an organization’s financial condition and vulnerabilities. However, financial vulnerability of nonprofit organizations is a relatively new area of study. In this paper, we compare two models used to forecast bankruptcy in the corporate sector (Altman 1968 and Ohlson 1980) with the model used by nonprofit researchers (Tuckman and Chang 1991). We find that the Ohlson model has higher explanatory power than either Tuckman and Chang’s or Altman’s in predicting four different measures of financial vulnerability. However, we show that none of the models, individually or combined, are effective in predicting financial distress. We then propose a more comprehensive model of financial vulnerability by adding two new variables to represent reliance on commercial-type activities to generate revenues and endowment sufficiency. We find that this model outperforms Ohlson’s model and performs substantially better in explaining and predicting financial vulnerability. Hence, the expanded model can be used as a guide for understanding the drivers of financial vulnerability and for identifying more effective proxies for nonprofit sector financial distress for use in future research.","PeriodicalId":102349,"journal":{"name":"Hauser Center For Nonprofit Organizations at Harvard University","volume":"166 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"120","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hauser Center For Nonprofit Organizations at Harvard University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.647662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120

Abstract

Effective nonprofit governance relies upon understanding an organization’s financial condition and vulnerabilities. However, financial vulnerability of nonprofit organizations is a relatively new area of study. In this paper, we compare two models used to forecast bankruptcy in the corporate sector (Altman 1968 and Ohlson 1980) with the model used by nonprofit researchers (Tuckman and Chang 1991). We find that the Ohlson model has higher explanatory power than either Tuckman and Chang’s or Altman’s in predicting four different measures of financial vulnerability. However, we show that none of the models, individually or combined, are effective in predicting financial distress. We then propose a more comprehensive model of financial vulnerability by adding two new variables to represent reliance on commercial-type activities to generate revenues and endowment sufficiency. We find that this model outperforms Ohlson’s model and performs substantially better in explaining and predicting financial vulnerability. Hence, the expanded model can be used as a guide for understanding the drivers of financial vulnerability and for identifying more effective proxies for nonprofit sector financial distress for use in future research.
评估非营利部门的财务脆弱性
有效的非营利组织治理依赖于对组织财务状况和脆弱性的理解。然而,非营利组织的财务脆弱性是一个相对较新的研究领域。在本文中,我们比较了用于预测企业部门破产的两种模型(Altman 1968和Ohlson 1980)和非营利研究人员使用的模型(Tuckman和Chang 1991)。我们发现,在预测四种不同的金融脆弱性指标时,Ohlson模型比Tuckman和Chang或Altman的模型具有更高的解释力。然而,我们表明,没有一个模型,单独或组合,是有效的预测财务困境。然后,我们提出了一个更全面的金融脆弱性模型,通过添加两个新变量来表示对商业类型活动的依赖来产生收入和捐赠充足性。我们发现这个模型优于Ohlson的模型,在解释和预测金融脆弱性方面表现得更好。因此,扩展后的模型可以作为理解财务脆弱性驱动因素的指南,并为未来研究中使用的非营利部门财务困境确定更有效的代理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信