Evaluations of evidence combination rules in terms of statistical sensitivity and divergence

Deqiang Han, J. Dezert, Yi Yang
{"title":"Evaluations of evidence combination rules in terms of statistical sensitivity and divergence","authors":"Deqiang Han, J. Dezert, Yi Yang","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.22461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theory of belief functions is one of the most important tools in information fusion and uncertainty reasoning. Dempster's rule of combination and its related modified versions are used to combine independent pieces of evidence. However, until now there is still no solid evaluation criteria and methods for these combination rules. In this paper, we look on the evidence combination as a procedure of estimation and then we propose a set of criteria to evaluate the sensitivity and divergence of different combination rules by using for reference the mean square error (MSE), the bias and the variance. Numerical examples and simulations are used to illustrate our proposed evaluation criteria. Related analyses are also provided.","PeriodicalId":136004,"journal":{"name":"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.22461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The theory of belief functions is one of the most important tools in information fusion and uncertainty reasoning. Dempster's rule of combination and its related modified versions are used to combine independent pieces of evidence. However, until now there is still no solid evaluation criteria and methods for these combination rules. In this paper, we look on the evidence combination as a procedure of estimation and then we propose a set of criteria to evaluate the sensitivity and divergence of different combination rules by using for reference the mean square error (MSE), the bias and the variance. Numerical examples and simulations are used to illustrate our proposed evaluation criteria. Related analyses are also provided.
从统计敏感性和散度方面评价证据组合规则
信念函数理论是信息融合和不确定性推理的重要工具之一。Dempster的合并规则及其相关的修改版本被用于合并独立的证据。然而,对于这些组合规则,目前还没有可靠的评价标准和方法。本文将证据组合看作一个估计过程,并以均方误差(MSE)、偏倚和方差为参考,提出了一套评价不同组合规则的敏感性和散度的准则。用数值算例和仿真来说明我们提出的评价标准。并进行了相关分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信