Comparative characterization of bio-aerosol nebulizers in connection to atmospheric simulation chambers

S. G. Danelli, M. Brunoldi, D. Massabò, F. Parodi, V. Vernocchi, P. Prati
{"title":"Comparative characterization of bio-aerosol nebulizers in connection\nto atmospheric simulation chambers","authors":"S. G. Danelli, M. Brunoldi, D. Massabò, F. Parodi, V. Vernocchi, P. Prati","doi":"10.5194/AMT-2020-490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The interplay of bio-aerosol dispersion and impact, meteorology, air quality is gaining increasing interest in the wide spectrum of atmospheric science. Experiments conducted inside confined artificial environments, such as the Atmospheric Simulations Chambers (ASCs), where atmospheric conditions and composition are controlled, can provide valuable information on bio-aerosol viability, dispersion, and impact. We focus here on the reproducible aerosolization and injection of viable microorganisms into an ASC, the first and crucial step of any experimental protocol to expose bio-aerosol at different atmospheric conditions. We compare the performance of three nebulizers specifically designed for bioaerosol applications: the Collison nebulizer, the Blaustein Atomizing Modules (BLAM) and the Sparging Liquid Aerosol Generator (SLAG), all manufactured and commercialized by CH TECHNOLOGIES. The comparison refers to operating conditions and the concentration of viable bacteria at the nebulizer outlet, with the final goal to measure the reproducibility of the nebulization procedure and assess the application in experiments at ASCs. A typical bacterial test model, Escherichia coli (ATCC® 25922™), was selected for such characterization. Bacteria suspensions, with a concentration around 108 CFU ml−1, were first aerosolized at different air pressures and collected by a Liquid Impinger, to obtain a correlation curve between airflow and nebulized bacteria, for each generator. Afterwards, bacteria were aerosolized inside the atmospheric simulation chamber ChAMBRe (Chamber for Aerosol Modelling and Bio-aerosol Research) to measure the reproducibility of the whole procedure. An overall reproducibility of 11 % was obtained with each nebulizer through a set of baseline experiments.","PeriodicalId":441110,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/AMT-2020-490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The interplay of bio-aerosol dispersion and impact, meteorology, air quality is gaining increasing interest in the wide spectrum of atmospheric science. Experiments conducted inside confined artificial environments, such as the Atmospheric Simulations Chambers (ASCs), where atmospheric conditions and composition are controlled, can provide valuable information on bio-aerosol viability, dispersion, and impact. We focus here on the reproducible aerosolization and injection of viable microorganisms into an ASC, the first and crucial step of any experimental protocol to expose bio-aerosol at different atmospheric conditions. We compare the performance of three nebulizers specifically designed for bioaerosol applications: the Collison nebulizer, the Blaustein Atomizing Modules (BLAM) and the Sparging Liquid Aerosol Generator (SLAG), all manufactured and commercialized by CH TECHNOLOGIES. The comparison refers to operating conditions and the concentration of viable bacteria at the nebulizer outlet, with the final goal to measure the reproducibility of the nebulization procedure and assess the application in experiments at ASCs. A typical bacterial test model, Escherichia coli (ATCC® 25922™), was selected for such characterization. Bacteria suspensions, with a concentration around 108 CFU ml−1, were first aerosolized at different air pressures and collected by a Liquid Impinger, to obtain a correlation curve between airflow and nebulized bacteria, for each generator. Afterwards, bacteria were aerosolized inside the atmospheric simulation chamber ChAMBRe (Chamber for Aerosol Modelling and Bio-aerosol Research) to measure the reproducibility of the whole procedure. An overall reproducibility of 11 % was obtained with each nebulizer through a set of baseline experiments.
与大气模拟室相连接的生物气溶胶雾化器的比较特性
摘要生物气溶胶的扩散和影响、气象学、空气质量的相互作用在大气科学的广泛领域中日益引起人们的兴趣。在密闭的人工环境中进行的实验,如大气模拟室(ASCs),在那里大气条件和成分受到控制,可以提供关于生物气溶胶活力、扩散和影响的宝贵信息。我们专注于可重复的雾化和注射活微生物到ASC中,这是在不同大气条件下暴露生物气溶胶的任何实验方案的第一步和关键步骤。我们比较了三种专门为生物气溶胶应用设计的雾化器的性能:Collison雾化器、Blaustein雾化模块(BLAM)和喷射液体气溶胶发生器(SLAG),它们都是由CH TECHNOLOGIES制造和商业化的。对比是指操作条件和喷雾器出口活菌浓度,最终目的是测量雾化过程的再现性,并评估其在ASCs实验中的应用。选择一种典型的细菌试验模型,大肠杆菌(ATCC®25922™)进行这种表征。首先,将浓度约为108 CFU ml−1的细菌悬浮液在不同气压下雾化,并通过液体撞击器收集,以获得每个发生器的气流与雾化细菌之间的相关曲线。然后,在大气模拟室ChAMBRe (chamber for Aerosol Modelling and Bio-aerosol Research)中雾化细菌,以测量整个过程的可重复性。通过一组基线实验,每个雾化器的总体重现性为11%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信