The Archigram Vision in the Context of Intelligent Environments and Its Current Potential

S. Yiannoudes
{"title":"The Archigram Vision in the Context of Intelligent Environments and Its Current Potential","authors":"S. Yiannoudes","doi":"10.1109/IE.2011.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formed in the 1960s cultural milieu, the Archigram avant-garde group envisaged and designed architectural environments able to respond to indeterminacy, individual choice, desires and needs. Their vision for an architecture able to provide instant services, automation and comfort, through cybernetic interfaces and robotized systems, seems to meet today the Ambient Intelligence (AmI) vision, applied in the so-called intelligent environments (IEs). Although outside the architecture discipline, these applications are able to proactively enhance and cater for people's life and needs either through autonomous/adaptive or user-driven control. This paper examines analogies and dissimilarities between Archigram's work and IEs looking at both their intentions and projects. It is argued that mainstream intelligent environments involve a functionalist flexibility paradigm, unlike Archigram's proposals. On the other hand, alternative types of intelligent environments, i.e. the so-called user-driven, seem to near Archigram's vision for indeterminately flexible spaces. Yet, the apparent potential of Archigram's experimental projects and hardware, especially those that are kinetically driven, is far from that vision and the capacities of user-driven IEs. The paper further examines contemporary attempts to combine user-driven control, indeterminacy and kinetics in architecture concluding that, apart from research in engineering systems and novel materials, conceptual guidelines toward this end are also needed.","PeriodicalId":207140,"journal":{"name":"2011 Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Environments","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IE.2011.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Formed in the 1960s cultural milieu, the Archigram avant-garde group envisaged and designed architectural environments able to respond to indeterminacy, individual choice, desires and needs. Their vision for an architecture able to provide instant services, automation and comfort, through cybernetic interfaces and robotized systems, seems to meet today the Ambient Intelligence (AmI) vision, applied in the so-called intelligent environments (IEs). Although outside the architecture discipline, these applications are able to proactively enhance and cater for people's life and needs either through autonomous/adaptive or user-driven control. This paper examines analogies and dissimilarities between Archigram's work and IEs looking at both their intentions and projects. It is argued that mainstream intelligent environments involve a functionalist flexibility paradigm, unlike Archigram's proposals. On the other hand, alternative types of intelligent environments, i.e. the so-called user-driven, seem to near Archigram's vision for indeterminately flexible spaces. Yet, the apparent potential of Archigram's experimental projects and hardware, especially those that are kinetically driven, is far from that vision and the capacities of user-driven IEs. The paper further examines contemporary attempts to combine user-driven control, indeterminacy and kinetics in architecture concluding that, apart from research in engineering systems and novel materials, conceptual guidelines toward this end are also needed.
智能环境下的建筑图视觉及其当前潜力
在20世纪60年代的文化背景下,Archigram先锋团体设想和设计了能够响应不确定性、个人选择、欲望和需求的建筑环境。他们的愿景是通过控制界面和机器人系统提供即时服务、自动化和舒适的架构,似乎符合当今环境智能(AmI)的愿景,应用于所谓的智能环境(IEs)。尽管这些应用程序不属于体系结构范畴,但它们能够通过自主/自适应或用户驱动的控制来主动增强和满足人们的生活和需求。本文考察了Archigram的工作与ie之间的相似之处和不同之处,同时考察了他们的意图和项目。与Archigram的建议不同,主流的智能环境涉及功能主义的灵活性范式。另一方面,替代类型的智能环境,即所谓的用户驱动,似乎接近Archigram对不确定灵活空间的愿景。然而,Archigram的实验项目和硬件,尤其是那些动态驱动的项目和硬件,显然与用户驱动的ie的愿景和能力相去甚远。本文进一步研究了当代建筑中结合用户驱动控制、不确定性和动力学的尝试,结论是,除了工程系统和新材料的研究外,还需要实现这一目标的概念指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信