Austerity, populism, and the politics of blame: an ideational perspective

D. Béland, Alex Waddan
{"title":"Austerity, populism, and the politics of blame: an ideational perspective","authors":"D. Béland, Alex Waddan","doi":"10.4337/9781789906745.00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In rich democracies, especially in Europe, austerity and populism are two major political phenomena that have drawn much scholarly attention since the 2008 financial crisis. Because of the contemporary prominence of these two concepts and their importance for ongoing social policy debates, working on the relationship between austerity and populism is a useful endeavour that could improve our understanding of these debates. To shed light on these concepts, it is necessary to define them before exploring their potential relationship. In this chapter, we do this using an ideational perspective that stresses the role of framing processes in the politics of social policy, with a focus on the politics of blame. Then, we use the example of the U.K. before and during the 2016 Brexit referendum to illustrate our claims.","PeriodicalId":178534,"journal":{"name":"Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906745.00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In rich democracies, especially in Europe, austerity and populism are two major political phenomena that have drawn much scholarly attention since the 2008 financial crisis. Because of the contemporary prominence of these two concepts and their importance for ongoing social policy debates, working on the relationship between austerity and populism is a useful endeavour that could improve our understanding of these debates. To shed light on these concepts, it is necessary to define them before exploring their potential relationship. In this chapter, we do this using an ideational perspective that stresses the role of framing processes in the politics of social policy, with a focus on the politics of blame. Then, we use the example of the U.K. before and during the 2016 Brexit referendum to illustrate our claims.
紧缩、民粹主义和指责政治:一个观念的视角
在富裕的民主国家,尤其是在欧洲,紧缩政策和民粹主义是2008年金融危机以来引起学术界广泛关注的两大政治现象。由于这两个概念在当代的突出地位及其对正在进行的社会政策辩论的重要性,研究紧缩与民粹主义之间的关系是一项有益的努力,可以提高我们对这些辩论的理解。为了阐明这些概念,有必要在探索它们之间的潜在关系之前对它们进行定义。在本章中,我们使用一个概念的角度来强调框架过程在社会政策政治中的作用,重点是指责政治。然后,我们用英国在2016年脱欧公投之前和期间的例子来说明我们的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信