Sentiment Analysis of Government Policy Regarding PPKM on Twitter Using LSTM

Green Arther Sandag, Eben Haezar Ekoputra Soegiarto, L. Laoh, Andre Gunawan, Debby E. Sondakh
{"title":"Sentiment Analysis of Government Policy Regarding PPKM on Twitter Using LSTM","authors":"Green Arther Sandag, Eben Haezar Ekoputra Soegiarto, L. Laoh, Andre Gunawan, Debby E. Sondakh","doi":"10.1109/ICORIS56080.2022.10031474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Policy of PPKM Covid from the government has become a popular topic to be discussed among the public, especially on Twitter. Due to the many responses or opinions about the PPKM that has been implemented by the government in Indonesia. Sentiment Analysis is the basis for research on the issue of Indonesian PPKM by using a deep learning model, namely LSTM. The data collection of tweets is obtained through crawling the data of Twitter API using the ‘snscrape’ module with the keyword “PPKM COVID” and the target data is 15,001 tweets. The data is processed and divided into two parts become 80% training data, 20% testing data and using the GRU, BiLSTM and RNN comparison models. Accuracy performance obtained from the four models include LSTM 90%, GRU 89%, BiLSTM 90% and RNN 85%. The comparison of the best accuracy results is obtained from the LSTM and BilSTM models. Furthermore, the result of sentiment obtained a high percentage for negative sentiment with a total percentage of 54.6%, while the positive sentiment had a percentage of 37.0% and neutral sentiment is 8.5%.","PeriodicalId":138054,"journal":{"name":"2022 4th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 4th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORIS56080.2022.10031474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Policy of PPKM Covid from the government has become a popular topic to be discussed among the public, especially on Twitter. Due to the many responses or opinions about the PPKM that has been implemented by the government in Indonesia. Sentiment Analysis is the basis for research on the issue of Indonesian PPKM by using a deep learning model, namely LSTM. The data collection of tweets is obtained through crawling the data of Twitter API using the ‘snscrape’ module with the keyword “PPKM COVID” and the target data is 15,001 tweets. The data is processed and divided into two parts become 80% training data, 20% testing data and using the GRU, BiLSTM and RNN comparison models. Accuracy performance obtained from the four models include LSTM 90%, GRU 89%, BiLSTM 90% and RNN 85%. The comparison of the best accuracy results is obtained from the LSTM and BilSTM models. Furthermore, the result of sentiment obtained a high percentage for negative sentiment with a total percentage of 54.6%, while the positive sentiment had a percentage of 37.0% and neutral sentiment is 8.5%.
基于LSTM的推特PPKM政府政策情感分析
政府的PPKM Covid政策已经成为公众讨论的热门话题,特别是在推特上。由于对印尼政府实施的PPKM有许多回应或意见。情感分析是利用深度学习模型LSTM研究印尼PPKM问题的基础。推文的数据收集是使用' sn抓取'模块抓取Twitter API的数据,关键字为“PPKM COVID”,目标数据为15,001条推文。对数据进行处理并分为两部分,分别为80%的训练数据、20%的测试数据和使用GRU、BiLSTM和RNN比较模型。四种模型的准确率分别为LSTM 90%、GRU 89%、BiLSTM 90%和RNN 85%。比较了LSTM和BilSTM模型的最佳精度结果。此外,在情绪的结果中,负面情绪所占的比例很高,占54.6%,而正面情绪所占的比例为37.0%,中性情绪所占的比例为8.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信