Smart Legal Contracts & Smarter Dispute Resolution

Ece Su Ustun, Melek Yuce
{"title":"Smart Legal Contracts & Smarter Dispute Resolution","authors":"Ece Su Ustun, Melek Yuce","doi":"10.1109/CBI54897.2022.10056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Availability, and efficiency of dispute resolution mechanisms are sine qua non for a healthy and prosperous environment. Regarding the technical difficulties and challenges, however, traditional judiciary mechanisms may not be effective for blockchain-related disputes. In this manner, judicialization of blockchain becomes highly inevitable, especially regarding the vision of creating a “self-sufficient system.” In this context, decentralized dispute resolution platforms have occurred and started to provide solutions to blockchain-based disputes. Yet, they are still far from being perfect and should be improved by legal standards and frameworks, as well as employing technical tools. This paper focuses on on-chain dispute resolution mechanisms for blockchain-related disputes, particularly those derived from smart legal contracts.","PeriodicalId":447040,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 24th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 24th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI54897.2022.10056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Availability, and efficiency of dispute resolution mechanisms are sine qua non for a healthy and prosperous environment. Regarding the technical difficulties and challenges, however, traditional judiciary mechanisms may not be effective for blockchain-related disputes. In this manner, judicialization of blockchain becomes highly inevitable, especially regarding the vision of creating a “self-sufficient system.” In this context, decentralized dispute resolution platforms have occurred and started to provide solutions to blockchain-based disputes. Yet, they are still far from being perfect and should be improved by legal standards and frameworks, as well as employing technical tools. This paper focuses on on-chain dispute resolution mechanisms for blockchain-related disputes, particularly those derived from smart legal contracts.
智能法律合同和智能争议解决
争端解决机制的可用性和效率是健康和繁荣环境的必要条件。然而,由于技术上的困难和挑战,传统的司法机制可能无法有效地解决与区块链相关的纠纷。以这种方式,区块链的司法化变得非常不可避免,特别是关于创建一个“自给自足的系统”的愿景。在此背景下,分散式争议解决平台应运而生,并开始为基于区块链的争议提供解决方案。然而,它们还远远不够完善,应该通过法律标准和框架以及使用技术工具来改进。本文重点关注区块链相关争议的链上争议解决机制,特别是那些源自智能法律合同的争议解决机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信