A Manifesto for Rewarding and Recognizing Team Infrastructure Roles

Arielle Bennett, Daniel Garside, Cassandra Gould van Praag, T. Hostler, Ismael Kherroubi Garcia, E. Plomp, Antonio Schettino, S. Teplitzky, Hao Ye
{"title":"A Manifesto for Rewarding and Recognizing Team Infrastructure Roles","authors":"Arielle Bennett, Daniel Garside, Cassandra Gould van Praag, T. Hostler, Ismael Kherroubi Garcia, E. Plomp, Antonio Schettino, S. Teplitzky, Hao Ye","doi":"10.36850/mr8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Scientific Reform Movement has highlighted the need for large research teams with diverse skills. This has necessitated the growth of professional team infrastructure roles (TIRs) who support research through specialised skills, but do not have primary responsibility for conceiving or leading research projects. TIRs such as Lab Technicians, Project Managers, Data Stewards, Community Managers, and Research Software Engineers all play an important role in ensuring the success of a research project, but are commonly neglected under current reward and recognition procedures, which focus on the individual academic researcher instead of the teams involved.\n\nWithout meaningful identification and recognition of TIR contributions, we risk reinforcing the conceptual and practical division between academic researchers and TIRs. This situation is inequitable and detrimental to the research enterprise: the limited potential for career advancement for TIRs may cause them to leave for other occupations, ultimately leading to a loss of institutional skill, expertise, and memory.\n\nThis contribution explores the evolution of specialist TIRs and the status of these positions in various settings. We provide three case study descriptions of TIR activities, so that readers may become more familiar with the breadth and depth of their work. We then propose system level changes designed to embed meaningful recognition of all contributions. Acknowledging the contributions of all research roles will help retain skill and expertise, and lead to collaborative research ecosystems that are well-positioned to address complex research challenges.","PeriodicalId":275817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trial and Error","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trial and Error","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36850/mr8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Scientific Reform Movement has highlighted the need for large research teams with diverse skills. This has necessitated the growth of professional team infrastructure roles (TIRs) who support research through specialised skills, but do not have primary responsibility for conceiving or leading research projects. TIRs such as Lab Technicians, Project Managers, Data Stewards, Community Managers, and Research Software Engineers all play an important role in ensuring the success of a research project, but are commonly neglected under current reward and recognition procedures, which focus on the individual academic researcher instead of the teams involved. Without meaningful identification and recognition of TIR contributions, we risk reinforcing the conceptual and practical division between academic researchers and TIRs. This situation is inequitable and detrimental to the research enterprise: the limited potential for career advancement for TIRs may cause them to leave for other occupations, ultimately leading to a loss of institutional skill, expertise, and memory. This contribution explores the evolution of specialist TIRs and the status of these positions in various settings. We provide three case study descriptions of TIR activities, so that readers may become more familiar with the breadth and depth of their work. We then propose system level changes designed to embed meaningful recognition of all contributions. Acknowledging the contributions of all research roles will help retain skill and expertise, and lead to collaborative research ecosystems that are well-positioned to address complex research challenges.
奖励和承认团队基础架构角色的宣言
科学改革运动强调了对拥有多种技能的大型研究团队的需求。这就需要专业团队基础设施角色(tir)的增长,他们通过专业技能支持研究,但不承担构思或领导研究项目的主要责任。tir,如实验室技术人员、项目经理、数据管理员、社区经理和研究软件工程师,都在确保研究项目成功方面发挥着重要作用,但在当前的奖励和认可程序下,它们通常被忽视,这些程序关注的是学术研究人员个人,而不是相关团队。如果没有对TIR贡献的有意义的识别和认可,我们就有可能加强学术研究人员和TIR之间概念和实践上的分歧。这种情况是不公平的,对研究企业是有害的:有限的职业发展潜力可能导致研究人员离开去从事其他职业,最终导致机构技能、专业知识和记忆的丧失。这篇文章探讨了专家tir的演变以及这些职位在各种环境中的地位。我们提供了三个TIR活动的案例研究描述,以便读者可以更熟悉他们工作的广度和深度。然后,我们提出了系统级别的变化,旨在嵌入对所有贡献的有意义的认可。承认所有研究角色的贡献将有助于保留技能和专业知识,并导致协作研究生态系统,这些生态系统能够很好地应对复杂的研究挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信