Characterizing Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Recreational Hook and Line Fishery in Southeastern Virginia, USA

S. A. Rose, Erin B. Bates, Allyson N. McNaughton, Kathryn J. O'Hara, S. Barco
{"title":"Characterizing Sea Turtle Bycatch in the Recreational Hook and Line Fishery in Southeastern Virginia, USA","authors":"S. A. Rose, Erin B. Bates, Allyson N. McNaughton, Kathryn J. O'Hara, S. Barco","doi":"10.2744/CCB-1476.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Although commercial hook and line fisheries pose a well-documented and significant threat to worldwide sea turtle populations, recreational hook and line fisheries remain understudied. This article describes information from sea turtle bycatch reported from interactions in the recreational hook and line fishery, as well as survey results from recreational anglers in Virginia from 2014 through 2018. Reports of interactions increased annually during the study with Kemp's ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) reported most frequently (n = 162), followed by 45 loggerheads (Caretta caretta), 6 green turtles (Chelonia mydas), and 39 unidentified sea turtles. Commonly encountered bait types were similar between surveyed anglers and bait used during turtle interactions, with significantly more squid bait noted during turtle interactions (51%) than used by surveyed anglers (29%) (χ2 = 41.32, p < 0.0001). Additionally, bloodworms and artificial bait were encountered comparatively less frequently during turtle interactions. Overall, interactions with the hook and line recreational fishery in Virginia appear opportunistic and involve otherwise healthy animals, presenting limited means for mitigating sea turtle bycatch. In the absence of regulatory oversight of bycaught sea turtles in the recreational fishery, mitigating injury from these interactions through targeted outreach provides a short-term solution to reducing the severity of these inevitable interactions.","PeriodicalId":126915,"journal":{"name":"Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World's Turtle and Tortoise Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chelonian Conservation and Biology: Celebrating 25 Years as the World's Turtle and Tortoise Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2744/CCB-1476.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract. Although commercial hook and line fisheries pose a well-documented and significant threat to worldwide sea turtle populations, recreational hook and line fisheries remain understudied. This article describes information from sea turtle bycatch reported from interactions in the recreational hook and line fishery, as well as survey results from recreational anglers in Virginia from 2014 through 2018. Reports of interactions increased annually during the study with Kemp's ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys kempii) reported most frequently (n = 162), followed by 45 loggerheads (Caretta caretta), 6 green turtles (Chelonia mydas), and 39 unidentified sea turtles. Commonly encountered bait types were similar between surveyed anglers and bait used during turtle interactions, with significantly more squid bait noted during turtle interactions (51%) than used by surveyed anglers (29%) (χ2 = 41.32, p < 0.0001). Additionally, bloodworms and artificial bait were encountered comparatively less frequently during turtle interactions. Overall, interactions with the hook and line recreational fishery in Virginia appear opportunistic and involve otherwise healthy animals, presenting limited means for mitigating sea turtle bycatch. In the absence of regulatory oversight of bycaught sea turtles in the recreational fishery, mitigating injury from these interactions through targeted outreach provides a short-term solution to reducing the severity of these inevitable interactions.
美国弗吉尼亚州东南部休闲鱼钩渔业中海龟副渔获的特征
摘要尽管商业鱼钩和线渔业对全球海龟种群构成了充分记录和重大威胁,但休闲鱼钩和线渔业仍未得到充分研究。本文描述了从休闲钩和线渔业相互作用中报告的海龟副捕获信息,以及2014年至2018年弗吉尼亚州休闲垂钓者的调查结果。在研究期间,相互作用的报告每年都在增加,其中最常见的是肯普雷氏海龟(Lepidochelys kempii) (n = 162),其次是45只红海龟(Caretta Caretta), 6只绿海龟(Chelonia mydas)和39只身份不明的海龟。在被调查的垂钓者中,常见的饵料类型与海龟互动时使用的饵料类型相似,在海龟互动时发现的鱿鱼饵料(51%)明显多于被调查的垂钓者(29%)(χ2 = 41.32, p < 0.0001)。此外,在海龟的相互作用中,血虫和人工诱饵的出现频率相对较低。总的来说,与弗吉尼亚的钓鱼和钓鱼娱乐渔业的互动似乎是机会主义的,涉及到其他健康的动物,对减少海龟附带捕获的手段有限。在缺乏对休闲渔业中附带捕获的海龟的监管的情况下,通过有针对性的外展来减轻这些相互作用造成的伤害,为降低这些不可避免的相互作用的严重性提供了一个短期解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信