Practicing Capitals Across Fields: Extending Bourdieu to Study Inter-Field Dynamics

M. Anesa, K. Chalkias, P. Jarzabkowski, A. P. Spee
{"title":"Practicing Capitals Across Fields: Extending Bourdieu to Study Inter-Field Dynamics","authors":"M. Anesa, K. Chalkias, P. Jarzabkowski, A. P. Spee","doi":"10.1108/S0733-558X2019000065B010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay extends a Bourdieusian perspective on the microfoundations of institutions. Drawing on this perspective, we argue that the recursive dynamics of institutions and action orient actors towards the maintenance of distinct and contradictory practices within, rather than bridging across, different fields. We corroborate our argument with an illustration of how corporate executives strategize within the tax field compared to the philanthropy field. Specifically, we show how actors are simultaneously oriented by different capitals towards apparently contradictory strategies. Our essay provides promising avenues for future research on the microfoundations of institutions, inter-field dynamics, and critical accounting and business ethics studies.","PeriodicalId":137632,"journal":{"name":"Microfoundations of Institutions","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microfoundations of Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X2019000065B010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This essay extends a Bourdieusian perspective on the microfoundations of institutions. Drawing on this perspective, we argue that the recursive dynamics of institutions and action orient actors towards the maintenance of distinct and contradictory practices within, rather than bridging across, different fields. We corroborate our argument with an illustration of how corporate executives strategize within the tax field compared to the philanthropy field. Specifically, we show how actors are simultaneously oriented by different capitals towards apparently contradictory strategies. Our essay provides promising avenues for future research on the microfoundations of institutions, inter-field dynamics, and critical accounting and business ethics studies.
跨领域的资本实践:扩展布迪厄对跨领域动态的研究
本文扩展了布尔迪厄学派对制度微观基础的观点。根据这一观点,我们认为制度和行动的递归动态使行动者倾向于在不同领域内保持独特和矛盾的实践,而不是在不同领域之间架起桥梁。我们通过与慈善领域相比,企业高管如何在税收领域制定战略来佐证我们的论点。具体来说,我们展示了参与者如何同时被不同的资本导向明显矛盾的策略。我们的文章为未来研究机构的微观基础、领域间动态、关键会计和商业伦理研究提供了有希望的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信