Benjamin J. Cohen, Advanced introduction to international policy economy, Elgar 2014, pp. 151

A. Kruk
{"title":"Benjamin J. Cohen, Advanced introduction to international policy economy, Elgar 2014, pp. 151","authors":"A. Kruk","doi":"10.2478/pn-2018-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1970, on the pages of “International Affairs”, the economist from the think tank Chathman House, Susan Strange, published an article entitled International economics and international relations: A case of mutual neglect. Her reflections concerned the lack of interlinkage of research on the international economic system and the international political system. She criticized the too-low contribution of economists to researching international relations, and even accused them of “political naivety”. Strange used an example from European studies and explained that internationology should draw on theoretical investigations on international economic relations. She stressed the need for interdisciplinary scientific meetings and supported the activities of economists within the Chatham House. When in 2014 Benjamin J. Cohen published Advanced introduction to international policy economy, he announced that Strange’s appeal to construct bridges between international relations and international economic relations met with understanding of researchers. In the twenty-first century, there is a series of interactions between international economic relations and international political relations, and we can observe the interpenetration of both disciplines. $e goal of the last (so far) of many books by Cohen, professor at the University of California, was a “tour d’horizon” by international economic relations to show the state of scientific discipline in various areas of the globe. Cohen reminded that in an earlier monograph, i.e. International political economy: An intellectual history, he undertook research on international economic relations in selected Anglo-Saxon countries, such as the USA, Canada, Great Britain and Australia. $e professor’s ambition was to broad-","PeriodicalId":256970,"journal":{"name":"Review of Nationalities","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Nationalities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pn-2018-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1970, on the pages of “International Affairs”, the economist from the think tank Chathman House, Susan Strange, published an article entitled International economics and international relations: A case of mutual neglect. Her reflections concerned the lack of interlinkage of research on the international economic system and the international political system. She criticized the too-low contribution of economists to researching international relations, and even accused them of “political naivety”. Strange used an example from European studies and explained that internationology should draw on theoretical investigations on international economic relations. She stressed the need for interdisciplinary scientific meetings and supported the activities of economists within the Chatham House. When in 2014 Benjamin J. Cohen published Advanced introduction to international policy economy, he announced that Strange’s appeal to construct bridges between international relations and international economic relations met with understanding of researchers. In the twenty-first century, there is a series of interactions between international economic relations and international political relations, and we can observe the interpenetration of both disciplines. $e goal of the last (so far) of many books by Cohen, professor at the University of California, was a “tour d’horizon” by international economic relations to show the state of scientific discipline in various areas of the globe. Cohen reminded that in an earlier monograph, i.e. International political economy: An intellectual history, he undertook research on international economic relations in selected Anglo-Saxon countries, such as the USA, Canada, Great Britain and Australia. $e professor’s ambition was to broad-
《国际政策经济学高级导论》,2014年第1期,第151页
1970年,英国智库查特曼研究所的经济学家苏珊·斯特兰奇在《国际事务》杂志上发表了一篇题为《国际经济学与国际关系:一个相互忽视的案例》的文章。她的思考涉及对国际经济体系和国际政治体系的研究缺乏相互联系。她批评经济学家在研究国际关系方面的贡献过低,甚至指责他们“政治幼稚”。斯特兰奇以欧洲研究为例,解释了国际学应该借鉴对国际经济关系的理论研究。她强调需要举行跨学科的科学会议,并支持查塔姆研究所内经济学家的活动。Benjamin J. Cohen在2014年出版《国际政策经济学高级导论》(Advanced introduction to international policy economy)时宣布,斯特兰奇呼吁在国际关系和国际经济关系之间搭建桥梁的观点得到了研究者的理解。在21世纪,国际经济关系和国际政治关系之间存在着一系列的相互作用,我们可以观察到这两个学科的相互渗透。加州大学教授科恩的最后一本(到目前为止)书的目标是通过国际经济关系的“视界之旅”来展示全球各个领域的科学学科状况。科恩提醒说,在他早期的专著《国际政治经济学:思想史》中,他对美国、加拿大、英国和澳大利亚等选定的盎格鲁-撒克逊国家的国际经济关系进行了研究。这位教授的志向是拓宽视野
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信