Draw (Causal) Conclusions from Data – Some Evidence

Karsten Lübke, Bianca Krol, S. Sülzenbrück
{"title":"Draw (Causal) Conclusions from Data – Some Evidence","authors":"Karsten Lübke, Bianca Krol, S. Sülzenbrück","doi":"10.52041/iase.ujhqs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To be data literate, one should be able to draw conclusions from multivariable observational data. But this is tricky. E.g., to investigate the gender pay gap, it must be decided whether the effect should be calculated adjusted or unadjusted for job. The correct conclusion depends on the qualitative assumptions about the data generating process. To investigate the conclusions drawn by students, a randomized experiment is conducted. The same data is presented in two different contexts with (possible) different structural causal models so once the adjusted and once the unadjusted effect might be appropriate. Also it is varied whether a directed acyclic graph is presented before or after the data table with the estimated effect. Results indicates that conclusions drawn from the same data differ by context but may also be inconsistent to the assumed data generating process.","PeriodicalId":189852,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IASE 2021 Satellite Conference","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IASE 2021 Satellite Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/iase.ujhqs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To be data literate, one should be able to draw conclusions from multivariable observational data. But this is tricky. E.g., to investigate the gender pay gap, it must be decided whether the effect should be calculated adjusted or unadjusted for job. The correct conclusion depends on the qualitative assumptions about the data generating process. To investigate the conclusions drawn by students, a randomized experiment is conducted. The same data is presented in two different contexts with (possible) different structural causal models so once the adjusted and once the unadjusted effect might be appropriate. Also it is varied whether a directed acyclic graph is presented before or after the data table with the estimated effect. Results indicates that conclusions drawn from the same data differ by context but may also be inconsistent to the assumed data generating process.
从数据中得出(因果)结论-一些证据
要有数据素养,一个人应该能够从多变量观测数据中得出结论。但这很棘手。例如,为了调查性别工资差距,必须决定这种影响是否应该根据工作进行调整或不调整。正确的结论取决于对数据生成过程的定性假设。为了验证学生得出的结论,我们进行了随机实验。同样的数据在两种不同的背景下呈现(可能)不同的结构因果模型,因此一旦调整和一旦未调整的效果可能是合适的。此外,有向无环图是在数据表之前还是之后呈现,其估计效果也是不同的。结果表明,从相同数据中得出的结论因上下文而异,但也可能与假设的数据生成过程不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信